Re: [WSG] CSS Site Check
Thanks Michael! -- tim Michael Donnermeyer spoke the following wise words on 13/02/2004 3:01 PM EST: Don't blame you. IE has been on my last nerve recently...ALOT. I wouldn't use the hack...it's a rather minor issue anyway, and the hack could cause other issues to arise...not to mention it's a hack. Looks fine in what I tried it in: Safari 1.2 Firebird 0.7 IE 5.2.3 Opera 6.03 * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
Re: [WSG] CSS Site Check
Thanks Chris, looks fine! -- tim p.s. It's best to send attachments privately and off the list. Posting a link is ok though =) -- [WSG]: the poor man's browsercam Chris Stratford spoke the following wise words on 12/02/2004 7:17 PM EST: Attached are two screenshots of your website as i see it in Crazy Browser (IE 6) and FIREFOX.
Re: [WSG] CSS Site Check
Looks fine in Safari 1.2, Firebird 0.7, and IE 5.2. One small this I saw is in IE the footer text runs into itself if the window is resized too small, say 600-700 pixels wide or smaller. Other than that and the usual mystery horizontal scrollbar, no probs. Lynx looks alright, but personally I'd put the header div above the body...just feels weird having it below, since it's a title. It also makes 'About Us' and 'Contact Us' appear twice very close together, which might be confusing for someone. MD On Feb 12, 2004, at 02:51, Tim Lucas wrote: Could you please check the following framework for a layout i'm doing: http://www.toolmantim.com/staging/main_layout.htm Intended display (horizontally liquid with no borders): http://www.toolmantim.com/staging/main_layout.gif Thanks everyone, -- tim * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
Re: [WSG] CSS Site Check
Thanks Michael, One small this I saw is in IE the footer text runs into itself if the window is resized too small, say 600-700 pixels wide or smaller. I'm choosing to ignore IE's lack of support for min-width. Other than that and the usual mystery horizontal scrollbar, no probs. Is it worth adding the -15px hack, and does anybody know of any side effects? Lynx looks alright, but personally I'd put the header div above the body...just feels weird having it below, since it's a title. It also makes 'About Us' and 'Contact Us' appear twice very close together, which might be confusing for someone. Good point. This body before header design was a result of SEO being important for this project. I think the confusing part though is the footer's "About Us... " being before the copyright message. This was so I didn't have to "float: left" the copyright to get them onto the same line. A little more markup and stylesheet for accessibility is definately worth it. I've changed the footer, could you guys please do a quick recheck to see if it's still ok in Opera Mac? -- tim Michael Donnermeyer spoke the following wise words on 12/02/2004 9:33 PM EST: Looks fine in Safari 1.2, Firebird 0.7, and IE 5.2. One small this I saw is in IE the footer text runs into itself if the window is resized too small, say 600-700 pixels wide or smaller. Other than that and the usual mystery horizontal scrollbar, no probs. Lynx looks alright, but personally I'd put the header div above the body...just feels weird having it below, since it's a title. It also makes 'About Us' and 'Contact Us' appear twice very close together, which might be confusing for someone. MD
Re: [WSG] CSS Site Check
Sorry.. forgot to include the URL: http://www.toolmantim.com/staging/main_layout.htm -- tim * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
Re: [WSG] CSS Site Check
Don't blame you. IE has been on my last nerve recently...ALOT. I wouldn't use the hack...it's a rather minor issue anyway, and the hack could cause other issues to arise...not to mention it's a hack. Looks fine in what I tried it in: Safari 1.2 Firebird 0.7 IE 5.2.3 Opera 6.03 On Feb 12, 2004, at 18:15, Tim Lucas wrote: I'm choosing to ignore IE's lack of support for min-width. Is it worth adding the -15px hack, and does anybody know of any side effects? I've changed the footer, could you guys please do a quick recheck to see if it's still ok in Opera Mac? -- tim Michael Donnermeyer spoke the following wise words on 12/02/2004 9:33 PM EST: Looks fine in Safari 1.2, Firebird 0.7, and IE 5.2. One small this I saw is in IE the footer text runs into itself if the window is resized too small, say 600-700 pixels wide or smaller. Other than that and the usual mystery horizontal scrollbar, no probs. Lynx looks alright, but personally I'd put the header div above the body...just feels weird having it below, since it's a title. It also makes 'About Us' and 'Contact Us' appear twice very close together, which might be confusing for someone. MD
[WSG] CSS Site Check
Could you please check the following framework for a layout i'm doing: http://www.toolmantim.com/staging/main_layout.htm Intended display (horizontally liquid with no borders): http://www.toolmantim.com/staging/main_layout.gif Thanks everyone, -- tim * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *
