The only advantage I can tell is that it just doesn't use any table or
td or tr tags, which I have an irrational hatred towards. I've done
what you suggested, but the problem is that I can't make the header have
the same width as the table. I've tried using a containing box, but
then the
Hey everyone, I've been reading this list for a couple weeks and this is
my first time posting. I've got a question about something I've been
working on recently. I'm pretty sure it's a lost cause, but I might as
well ask.
I recently converted a directory lister script from using table tags
Is there an advantage of using css tables over regular tables? I'd just
use a normal one as that'll do the job well, with no need for
agent-switching, etc.
That said, if you want to use css.. you could just seperate the header
from the table, give it a seperate class and set the width
Have a look at this CSS/table tutorial
http://markl.f2o.org/tutorial/tables/Advanced_Tables.html
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: [WSG] CSS Tables
Hey everyone, I've been reading this list for a couple
Noa Groveman spoke the following wise words on 22/04/2004 11:37 AM EST:
Hey everyone, I've been reading this list for a couple weeks and this is
my first time posting. I've got a question about something I've been
working on recently. I'm pretty sure it's a lost cause, but I might as
well
The only advantage I can tell is that it just doesn't use any table or
td or tr tags, which I have an irrational hatred towards. I've done
what you suggested, but the problem is that I can't make the header have
the same width as the table. I've tried using a containing box, but
then the
On 22/04/2004, at 11:37 AM, Noa Groveman wrote:
I recently converted a directory lister script from using table tags
to using CSS styled tables (display:table), and I've noticed that
there is no provision for a colspan attribute. This makes sense,
because tables are for displaying tabular
On 22/04/2004, at 12:19 PM, Noa Groveman wrote:
The only advantage I can tell is that it just doesn't use any table
or td or tr tags, which I have an irrational hatred towards. I've
done what you suggested, but the problem is that I can't make the
header have the same width as the table.
Hi and welcome Noa!
The only advantage I can tell is that it just doesn't use any
table or
td or tr tags, which I have an irrational hatred towards.
Let's not get carried away with hatred for tables. They have a place in
(x)html and where appropriate are the best tool for the job. Using them
Well, the IE version of the table displays the way I want (view it by
simply visiting http://eastsdomain.com/test/ with IE - I also made a
static version of this page in case you're running nix - listed below).
The only problem is that it uses tables. I know it seems
unreasonable, but I've
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
il.com Subject: [WSG] CSS Tables... [Virus
checkedAU
Ok, wow
Well I must have done something wrong when I tried
the FLOAT:LEFT and right
It did get to me, so I left it hehehe
Also, if you want to see my full CSS Guestbook: www.neester.com/guestbook.php
What do you think of that?
I think it makes the page load quicker because
since
December 2003 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Tables...
Hey Chris
why don't you try a horizontal list - they're ok for this kind of stuff.
I do a similar thing at my.spamtrap.net.au with titles and logins...
Cheers
James
]
http://www.neester.com
-Original Message-
From: James Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 15 December 2003 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Tables...
Hey Chris
why don't you try a horizontal list - they're ok for this kind
14 matches
Mail list logo
