Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put emphasis on
Web Standards suddenly found their way back to non-liquid, 800px, centered
design. I am wondering why that is?
The majority of pages that show up in this group for review display some
kind of centered design with 800px
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vicki Berry
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2005 9:05 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Mystery connection of css and non-liquid design
I can't speak for anyone else but as displays
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] schrieb:
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put emphasis on
Web Standards suddenly found their way back to non-liquid, 800px, centered
design. I am wondering why that is?
Andreas, there is a long discussion with many comments in some
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put
emphasis on Web Standards suddenly found their way back to
non-liquid, 800px, centered design. I am wondering why that is?
Makes me wonder too. :-)
I find this amazing: when I browse the web
and I found this answer (Fixed or fluid width? Elastic!) here
I was going to say so... Elastic design !
As Ingo noted, there is quite a bit of discussion on the subject.
Besides the usual arguments, one aspect I haven't seen mentioned often.
Webcontent is seen on a variety of displays : mobile
On 5/2/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote: Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put emphasis on Web Standards suddenly found their way back to non-liquid, 800px, centered design. I am wondering why that is?
i really admire a
Vicki Berry wrote:
I can't speak for anyone else but as displays (monitors/resolution) get
larger and larger, liquid designs (IMO) start to look ridiculous.
Text is easier to read in short stretches than in loong
lines across a page. It's an accessibility thing.
It need
