Re: [WSG] Rendering difference between Strict Transitional doctypes in FF, IE8 Safari

2009-06-26 Thread David Hucklesby
David Dorward wrote: David Hucklesby wrote: I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames of any kind? http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/elements.html clearly marks iframe as a feature of the Loose (AKA transitional) DTD. A question of knowing where to look. Thanks for

Re: [WSG] Rendering difference between Strict Transitional doctypes in FF, IE8 Safari

2009-06-25 Thread David Hucklesby
Damian Edwards wrote: [...] It only affects a few elements on the page (see links below) and is driving us mental. We need to serve this page as transitional as it uses a 3rd party service that requires an iframe. ... I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames

Re: [WSG] Rendering difference between Strict Transitional doctypes in FF, IE8 Safari

2009-06-25 Thread David Dorward
David Hucklesby wrote: I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames of any kind? http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/elements.html clearly marks iframe as a feature of the Loose (AKA transitional) DTD. ***

[WSG] Rendering difference between Strict Transitional doctypes in FF, IE8 Safari

2009-06-24 Thread Damian Edwards
Heya, We've found a really strange issue with some CSS layout when serving a page with XHTML 1.0 Transitional vs. XHTML 1.1 (or XHTML 1.0 Strict), in Firefox 3, Safari IE8. The exact same behaviour is seen using the HTML 4.01 versions of the doctypes too. From what I've