Thanks for replying Lea, seems like we share the same experience. -Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lea de Groot
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:29 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lennart Fylling
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 6:36 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS - Doesn't the HTML Matter More?
Lea de Groot wrote:
> Sadly, I've been unable
Lea de Groot wrote:
Sadly, I've been unable to find any evidence of semantic code helping
SEO, or even of the bots preferring semantic code, *except* for the
unproven possibility of code so badly formed that a searchbot cant
figure out the content of the page. (ie code that validates wont have
this
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:03:51 -0500, Chris Rizzo wrote:
> 2) And how does using good semantic code in your HTML help SEO, if at all?
> Do the engines prefer to read semantic code, and if so why? Does that
> translate to an SEO benefit?
Sadly, I've been unable to find any evidence of semantic code h
TECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Pepper
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:45 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Search Engines and CSS - Doesn't the HTML Matter More?
Chris,
A few issues with CSS spamming:
http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com/enigma_log0411.htm
I've not tou
gines and CSS - Doesn't the HTML Matter More?
Hi,
I guess I want to interject here a bit. Maybe steer the conversation in a
different direction because I'm very interested in this topic being a person
who believes in the benefits of CSS, and who does quite a lot of SEO.
>From L
Hi,
I guess I want to interject here a bit. Maybe steer the conversation in a
different direction because I'm very interested in this topic being a person
who believes in the benefits of CSS, and who does quite a lot of SEO.
>From Lea's previous post:
"> I've been searching around for an answer t
