Return Receipt
Your [WSG] Site Checking
document
> When checking the sites in opera, I noticed that the Lloyd Motors one
isn't
> displaying properally in Opera. The background image for the body doesn’t
> display on the bottom as required. This is the CSS I have:
> background:#F2F5F9 url(images/bodyBg.png) repeat-x bottom;
> Any ideas how to fi
@ Rowena
Thanks Rowena for those tips. I have downloaded and installed Opera 7.5 to
fix the faults.
I have fixed everything you mentioned now. So, I hope that the sites are
more accessible to opera users now.
Incidentally, fixing the Cardi Grain navigation for Opera introduced a new
one for IE
Phil Baines :
http://dev.netring.co.uk/teifiscaffolding/
http://dev.netring.co.uk/cardi%5Fgrain/
http://dev.netring.co.uk/lloydmotors/
_
Hi Phil
Nice layouts. I'm seeing problems in two of the sites in Opera 7.4.
In the Teifi Scaffolding I see the word Navigation in caps sitt
@Rob
> Hey, I'm just a n00b.
Hey, we are all n00bs in some way, learning something new every day. I will
look into this, and see what comes out of it. You might be right about the
spec, but sometimes we have to trade off between the spec, and what browsers
actually support.
Thanks for your he
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:13:16 -, Phil Baines
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Clean code, except for two silly things I checked in Teifi's site: > name="content" class="skipTo"> The attribute name should be
> > replaced by id, and the link may have some content to keep in logical
> > for screen r
@ Graham Cook:
> * Place link to Home at left, not right, of menu bar
Good usability point. Thanks. I take it you were referring to the
Scaffolding site, I have changed this, and I am making the logo a link to
the home page also (something I normally always do, but forgot in this
case).
> * Repl
@ Rob:
> The first things that caught my attention are the file sizes of the
> images. Not everybody's on broadband yet...
Some of the Cardi Grain ones yeah, but I don’t think that the other two
sites have any really big images. Some of them will probably go under some
high optimisation before g
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:19:19 -, Phil Baines
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> This is my first message to the list, but I have been watching for a little
> while. Weldon to the Administrators for maintaining a good list, and to the
> posters for keeping the list so busy!
>
>
M
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site Checking
>> web standards complaint sites
>Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant?
>N
HAha! Good catch Obviously it should have been "web standards
compliant sites".
Thanks for help
>> web standards complaint sites
>Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant?
>N
HAha! Good catch Obviously it should have been "web standards compliant
sites".
Thanks for helping me laugh at myself :)
Phil
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked
On 2 Dec 2004, at 9:19 PM, Phil Baines wrote:
web standards complaint sites
Cool. Is this for complaining about sites that aren't compliant?
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list f
Hi Folks,
This is my first message to the list, but I have been
watching for a little while. Weldon to the Administrators for maintaining a
good list, and to the posters for keeping the list so busy!
Anyway, the company I work for (Netring) has starting
producing web standards comp
13 matches
Mail list logo
