Re: [WSG] Site check (eCommerce)

2005-08-17 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Jona Decker wrote:
> I think a definition list is the most semantically correct markup for
> an FAQ. If you look at the w3 documention on lists it says that DLs

> ordered list, beaten into submission with style. Normally. BUT the
> way you are delivering directions on this site eliminates confusion
> as to "ordering" since you used a narrative style.

Thanks Jona

Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Site check (eCommerce)

2005-08-17 Thread Jona Decker
Thierry Koblentz wrote:

>>
- Is a DL the right markup for the FAQ and Directions pages?
>>

I think a definition list is the most semantically correct markup for an
FAQ. If you look at the w3 documention on lists it says that DLs
"...consist of two parts: a term and a description" which is pretty
close to the structure of an FAQ/FQA. The definition term is posed as a
question, e.g. "What sets the Gold Membership apart from silver or
bronze?" and the definition description would answer that, further
defining the term. Maybe that's a stretch but I think it's the best fit
we've got within our toolset. 

I'm not sure a definition list is the best choice for directions because
they have an order by necessity. So I would consider an ordered list,
beaten into submission with style. Normally. BUT the way you are
delivering directions on this site eliminates confusion as to "ordering"
since you used a narrative style. 

I'm not sure it's any *less* correct than the use of a DL for the FAQ.
After all, you are defining the term "store location from 280" and
answering with a definition of place. (It's not that disimilar from a
legal description of land in the U.S., for example "Southwest Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter of Section 18, Township 27, Range 16 except a
tract out of the Northwest corner thereof, described to-wit..."). That's
*defining* but also directional. Seems like your directions are too.

Jona

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] Site check (eCommerce)

2005-08-17 Thread Thierry Koblentz
http://63.135.116.208

Hi all,
I have a few questions:
- Is a DL the right markup for the FAQ and Directions pages?
- On many pages (Home, CheckOut, FAQ, Directions), I'm using "the same link
text to refer to different resources" (13.1 Clearly identify the target of
each link). Should I be really concerned by that or is it OK because these
do not really link to anything "specific" ("skip table" link for example).
- I'm not using tabindex attributes; do "I have to" or is it OK as long as
the user can move in sequence between links/fields?

Anything else I should worry about? I'm aiming for WAI level 3...

BTW, I'm aware that the PDF file is corrupted

Thanks,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**