Re: [WSG] Standard for "committing" changes to a database?

2008-04-14 Thread James Jeffery
Let the user modify the data and submit any changes. Its how most applications work and its what the users are used to. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/j

Re: [WSG] Standard for "committing" changes to a database?

2008-04-11 Thread Joseph Ortenzi
eview before you save something awful. Elizabeth Web editor www.spiegelweb.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jessica Enders Sent: Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:38 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Standard for &

RE: [WSG] Standard for "committing" changes to a database?

2008-04-10 Thread Elizabeth Spiegel
Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:38 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Standard for "committing" changes to a database? Hi everyone I am currently reviewing a desktop application that involves mostly viewing and changing records in a database (via a nice GUI front end). In some pl

Re: [WSG] Standard for "committing" changes to a database?

2008-04-09 Thread Taco Fleur
Interesting; we're going through the same process here. There is talk about converting the "view" pages to editable pages that commit the changes right away. I'm completely against it. I think it will bring along with it lots of issues; - when you have text fields that are 20 in size, and the text

[WSG] Standard for "committing" changes to a database?

2008-04-09 Thread Jessica Enders
Hi everyone I am currently reviewing a desktop application that involves mostly viewing and changing records in a database (via a nice GUI front end). In some places, changes are "committed" as soon as you enter them, a bit like how Microsoft Access operates. In other places, the user has