Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
"Use to force [of
Web Standards]"
Cute. This may yet become the new tag line of the WSG
(If George doen't mind.)
Apologies to all - I seem to have done some thread hijacking of my own!
That off-topic post was made in a flippant mood on Saturday night. The site
in question was taken down a year or two ago, so the games cannot be seen.
However, the front page is still available on the wayback machine (may
offe
Neerav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I can view it in Firefox 0.8 , heres the text for ppl who cant access it
> for some reason
>
> http://news.awn.com/index.php?newsitem_no=4149
Sorry, I meant the site the article talks about - webwank.net - I want to
throw tampons at John Howard!
--
Kay Smolj
Hi Kay,
>> http://news.awn.com/index.php?newsitem_no=4149
>
>Is the site no longer up?
I can see it, and had a good giggle :-)
--
Yours,
Kym
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guid
I can view it in Firefox 0.8 , heres the text for ppl who cant access it
for some reason
http://news.awn.com/index.php?newsitem_no=4149
Australian Government Sets Out To Ban Political Web Game
January 23, 2001
"Government officials in Australia are threatening a lawsuit against
WebWank.net for p
Russ Weakley - Maxdesign <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I played around with flash and and then Peter and I were threatened with
> defamation in the Supreme Court of Queensland:
> http://news.awn.com/index.php?newsitem_no=4149
Is the site no longer up?
--
Kay Smoljak
http://www.newlookhair.com.au
I think can beat that!
I played around with flash and and then Peter and I were threatened with
defamation in the Supreme Court of Queensland:
http://news.awn.com/index.php?newsitem_no=4149
But that was before we became responsible listparents :)
Russ
> I played around with flash - in a wk i
Horses for courses - you build what will attract your client's audience -
if the client requires a site for a niche audience with it's own
characteristics (as long as these are known not just assumed) then a lot of
the usual cliches about not losing part of the potential audience MAY not
apply.
Horses for courses - you build what will attract your client's audience -
if the client requires a site for a niche audience with it's own
characteristics (as long as these are known not just assumed) then a lot of
the usual cliches about not losing part of the potential audience MAY not
apply.
Horses for courses - you build what will attract your client's audience -
if the client requires a site for a niche audience with it's own
characteristics (as long as these are known not just assumed) then a lot of
the usual cliches about not losing part of the potential audience MAY not
apply.
Good points mike.
I know what you mean, and that was my original idea with the website.
although the websites I produced turned out to be - lets say - less
than ideal for the audience.
I know flash isn't totally inaccessible - but its not avaliable on
mobiles, its not always avaliable on PC's.
Chris,
look at it this way: they're all going to be tripping, anyway, so you're just
doubling up on the psychedelic experience :o)
Don't
do it. Go standards. My stepson's heading a D & B/Jungle unit so I've got to
dip more than a toe into that environment very shortly. I didn't even consid
n M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
"Use to force [of
Web Standards]"
And if that doesn't work there's always good ol "eennie meenie miney
mo"
Standards-based sites can be flashy, personally I wouldn't mes
urday, June 05, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject:
[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
Hey list,
I have something which has been a major topic of discussion between a
friend and I.
I am currently working on a promotions website - promoting for Sydney
Nightclubs (R&B Scene)
T
That was my originaly thought...
I am still contemplating what to do.
I really want to make it look appealing - and yet still compliant.
Good point that the graphics are still all the same - regardless of the
code.
Something I may have forgotten.
Well you have some very good points which I ap
Title: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
Wooops the link in the other email is
actually...
http://www.taupowebdesigns.co.nz/
sorry :$
Camz
www.t94xr.net.nz
> Don't get suckered into the myth that standards based web sites can't look
as
> good as old-school tag soup sites. That's what people who can't be
bothered
> learning something new use as an argument.
Quite true but they dont have the interactivity as flash does. flash isnt
good for hte main act
Title: RE[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
The last part of my mail should've read "I was never good with animation"; sorry for the error (it's 11:30 PM here in San Francisco right now).
Title: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
I played around with flash - in a wk i made blue
box move from one side to another :D!!
- Original Message -
From:
Sean M. Hall AKA
Dante
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 6:14
PM
Subject
Title: RE:[WSG] Standards Compliance -vs- User Enjoyment
"Use to force [of Web Standards]"
And if that doesn't work there's always good ol "eennie meenie miney mo"
Standards-based sites can be flashy, personally I wouldn't mess around with that
Chris Stratford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> To knuckle down and get to the point - Do I use webstandards and
> efficent coding to make the website...
> Or do I use Flash, Verbose Table Layouts, Lots of Images & Animations
> etc... To get people interested.
Don't get suckered into the myth that s
June 05, 2004 5:28
PM
Subject: [WSG] Standards Compliance -vs-
User Enjoyment
Hey list,I have something
which has been a major topic of discussion between a friend and I.I am
currently working on a promotions website - promoting for Sydney Nightclubs
(R&B Scene)To knuckle d
Hey list,
I have something which has been a major topic of discussion between a
friend and I.
I am currently working on a promotions website - promoting for Sydney
Nightclubs (R&B Scene)
To knuckle down and get to the point - Do I use webstandards and
efficent coding to make the website...
Or
23 matches
Mail list logo
