* Don't use postback. Just give up, it's a badly implemented hack to
maintain state in a webpage misusing forms and introducing complete
JavaScript dependence. Just because Visual Studio makes it very easy
to accidentally use it, doesn't make it ok. Just pretend it was never
there.
Do you mean
Hi,Yesterday I spoke with you all regarding issues with using CSS and .NET. Below is the site underdevelopment. I'm told div's are casuing a problem, in addition to tdthCould someone look over this and offer suggestions, on Standards based implementation with .NET"Today we found screen resolution
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/ASPNET2XHTML.asp
VS2005 drastically improves this situ.
hth
:]
w
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I spoke with you all regarding issues with using CSS and
.NET. Below is the site underdevelopment. I'm told div's are casuing a
problem, in addition to
the best!
Rachel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Wayne Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 9:12 a.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards and .NET
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/ASPNET2XHTML.asp
VS2005
A few tips based on my experience of working with ASP.NET 1.1:
* First up, consider sticking to an HTML 4 DOCTYPE. It's really not as
big a deal as some advocates would have you think ;-) - Critically, if
you try and force it to use XHTML and someone accidentally clicks
'Design View' your code is
Avoid using the pre-wrapped ASP.NET controls. DataGrids aren't so
bad, but you get much more mark-up control by using a Repeater.
Similarly, rather than using an asp:label, there's a mark-upless version
that doesn't insert span elements. I forget the name, sorry, but it
does exist.
I think Ben
Hello WSG,
I 've only been on the list for a couple of weeks and I've found the
discussion really interesting. Anyway...
I am working on a .NET CMS product and we are currently wrestling to
make the output standards compliant which is proving to be tricky. Does
anybody know of any off the
. This can be a lot more work ... but it is an option.
I hope this gives you some starting points.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Leech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:12 PM
Subject: [WSG] standards compliant .NET modules
Hello WSG,
I 've only
Hi
Surely a .net developer can write their own function to output compliant
markup? seems strange that a language forces someone to use inbuilt modules.
Cheers
James
SomeNewKid wrote:
The ASP.NET framework does not produce standards compliant XHTML. Hence, no
off-the-shelf forum component for
Subject: Re: [WSG] standards compliant .NET modules
Hi
Surely a .net developer can write their own function to output compliant
markup? seems strange that a language forces someone to use inbuilt
modules.
Cheers
James
SomeNewKid wrote:
The ASP.NET framework does not produce standards
10 matches
Mail list logo
