Sorry have to jump on that one, Rick.
No application can create extra pixels where only one existed. At
best, they can interpolate what a pixel _might need to be_ by being
very clever about the pixels surroundings and using sophisticated
filters and techniques, but it is an educated guess
On 8 Jul 2008, at 10:24, Joseph Ortenzi wrote:
No application can create extra pixels where only one existed. At
best, they can interpolate what a pixel _might need to be_ by being
very clever about the pixels surroundings and using sophisticated
filters and techniques, but it is an
I completely understand everyone's comments on image enlargement using
professional graphic applications vs. browsers using their cheesy routines.
What I didn't know was if I had missed any use of proper techniques within
CSS to achieve what I needed.
My first post exposes the approaches I am
Unfortunately, the link is intranet. I could perhaps attempt to post the
skeletal code of the test version, if it's really required.
From your earlier email I'm starting to gather that if an image is wider
than the width of the div (or even browser window), auto-fitting isn't going
to be a
My web page is divided into 5 parts: Header, Left Sidebar, Content, Right
Sidebar Footer. Within the header, I wish to place a large logo, a mini
logo and a site name or company name in large text. Currently, the CSS I'm
using for the header is:
:
:
div {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 1px
Hi Matt,
If you stretch the img (you can't stretch a background-image as far as I
know), you will definitely not be happy with the results.
I am assuming you have a flexible design where the content expands to fit
the width of the browser's window? If that is the case, create a very wide
Kepler,
Thanks for the quick reply.
I'm using a 3 column elastic design with a min-width of 54 em. The
content div stretches like a hybrid does, but the left and right sidebars
don't. The header and footer will stretch without a problem as well. The
content is embedded between the
