Marc
Camino, like Firefox, is a beta release so it's going to have bugs in
it. You should lodge these bugs at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/, rather
than here and you'll get noticed by the Camino development team.
HTH
James
Marc Greenstock wrote:
Hi all,
I hope this isn't too OT but I have
- Original Message -
From: James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] entities bug in camino
Marc
Camino, like Firefox, is a beta release so it's going to have bugs in
it. You should lodge these bugs at http
Thanks very much for that - now I get it!
Peter
rsquo; is an alternate (easier to remember) code than the official
unicode definition of #8217. All possible characters have a
specific number assigned to them in Unicode. The lettered helpers
came out after unicode was out to ease the pain of
I added some links a while back about kangxi radicals etc etc to the WSG
site
http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat18
Interestingly you can do a quick script to test compatibility in
browsers for the various unicode characters..
$i=0;
while
print #.$i.;;
i++;
For most of the chrs, IE
I believe that for quotes it's handy to use the
entities because you define proper opening and closing
quotes, instead of using the uni-directional default
as defined on the keyboard.
It's probably safest to use entities in all your text,
as then they have no way of conflicting with the
actual
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 02:20 PM, Universal Head wrote:
A quick HTML Entities question. For a closed single quote, for
example, is it better to use
rsquo;
or
#8217;
- and what is the distinction?
I can't answer your specific case, but I *can* paraphrase it with an
example of my
What's the technical difference between the two options? Are the
numeric entities the original form and the typographical ones more
recent?
The reason this came up is that I've been using the numeric ones, and
then I started using skEdit which is an excellent coding tool, but
uses the
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 04:12 PM, Universal Head wrote:
What's the technical difference between the two options? Are the
numeric entities the original form and the typographical ones more
recent?
The reason this came up is that I've been using the numeric ones, and
then I started
rsquo; is an alternate (easier to remember) code than the official
unicode definition of #8217. All possible characters have a specific
number assigned to them in Unicode. The lettered helpers came out after
unicode was out to ease the pain of having to remember a set of digits
that had
