@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
Come on Steve, tell us why not then?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Green"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
-Original Message
Come on Steve, tell us why not then?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Green"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgro
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Oliver Boermans
Sent: 07 March 2012 11:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
On 6 March 2012 09:20, Dan Freeman wrote:
> How about in HT
On 6 March 2012 09:20, Dan Freeman wrote:
> How about in HTML5?
>
>
> Some Title
>
> Item 1
> Item 2
> Item 3
>
>
>
> OR:
>
>
> Some
: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
For this example:
some title
blah
boo
... any ARIA attributes are completely not required... tag, by
definition, already titles the following content, simply by being in the
same proximity, aka preceding some other content.
The
For this example:
some title
blah
boo
... any ARIA attributes are completely not required... tag, by
definition, already titles the following content, simply by being in the
same proximity, aka preceding some other content.
The primary purpose of "labelled-by" appears to be to semantica
hi again,
maybe i missed something but whats the issue with using heading in a list?
regards
stevef
On 5 March 2012 01:51, Steve Faulkner wrote:
> Hi, agree with Russ here,
>
> for example does
>
>
> change the semantics? I think not, use of aria-labelledby is another way
> of doing the same
Hi, agree with Russ here,
for example does
change the semantics? I think not, use of aria-labelledby is another way of
doing the same thing.
note in practice for the majority case neither is announced by user agents
such as assitive technology at the moment.
Also if it was then you would get a
point of having these new toolsets in the first place.
See also: Microdata.
Cheers,
S
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Russ Weakley
Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 4:47 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] li
> The list title
>
> ...
>
> That way the semantic connection between the list and the heading is kept
> which I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
> Cheers,
> S
>
I hate to nit-pick, but I'd argue that the aria-labelledby does not really
change the semantics of an element. Th
kept which
I think is the purpose of what you're wanting, yes?
Cheers,
S
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Josephson
Sent: Monday, 5 March 2012 2:07 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list head
Is there good reason NOT to use -
#UL H1
... so -
...
...
rather than what I read here as
..
..
Simon Josephson
si...@artatwork.com.au
On 05/03/2012, at 11:24 AM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
> Interes
Interesting... who said that H? has document scope only?
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-h1-h2-h3-h4-h5-and-h6-elements
Show examples of multiple H1's... H? is indeed suitable as a heading to a
list.
cheers,
Mathew Robertson
On 3 March 2012 04:38, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:
> >
it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Elizabeth Spiegel
> Web editing
>
> 0409 986 158
> GPO Box 729, Hobart TAS 7001
> www.spiegelweb.com.au
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
> Behalf Of Dan Freeman
Of Dan Freeman
Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2012 6:12 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
I wouldn't recommend that. It may look OK stylistically, but not
semantically. I believe H? before the list makes the most sense.
- Dan Freeman
-Original M
012 1:23 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
Quick links
Notice
To:
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] list heading - best practice?
On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:
looks like back in 1984 people could use for the job.
No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched in
favour of docum
> before the list.
thats the way i do it, but it doesn't feel right.
in most of my cases the is more secondary content, like menus etc.
i want to keep to for structuring the main content.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstanda
On 2 Mar 2012, at 17:07, Hanspeter Kadel wrote:
> looks like back in 1984 people could use for the job.
No, they couldn't. It was proposed for HTML 3, but that spec was ditched in
favour of documenting the then current state of the browser wars.
> how to do it in 2012?
before the list.
hey listeners,
i'm wondering whats the best way to entitle a list.
looks like back in 1984 people could use for the job.
how to do it in 2012?
thanks!
hans
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
20 matches
Mail list logo
