I agree to a large extent, but sometimes one has to consider:
1. Using MathML or CML is not an option as they are not supported by most
(actually used) user agents. CML, one can argue, is also not a W3C-standard.
2. For very simple math or chemistry MathML and CML could be considered
Thank you.
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
dszady wrote:
I also remember a post saying not to use the two elements but it
didn't mention why.
In my opinion, sub and sup have a primarily visual/presentational
nature, rather than a semantic one. I'm still puzzled as to why they're
still included
dszady wrote:
I also remember a post saying not to use the two elements but it didn't
mention why.
In my opinion, sub and sup have a primarily visual/presentational
nature, rather than a semantic one. I'm still puzzled as to why they're
still included in the specs, which does nothing to