On 1/18/06, Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could be completely wrong here, and I am sure you will tell me so if
> that's the case.
> But I would think that a menu that has sub menus would need to be displayed
> as the following for it to be semantically correct;
>
>
>
wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] [OT] Flyout Menu (Semantically correct
> plus more ...)
>
> From: "Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:02 PM
> Subject: RE: [WSG] [OT] Flyout Menu (Semantically corr
From: "Terrence Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] [OT] Flyout Menu (Semantically correct plus more
...)
Al Sparber said:
Just out of curiosity, can you explain which menus are sematically
incorrect and why?
Hi A
Al Sparber said:
> Just out of curiosity, can you explain which menus are sematically
> incorrect and why?
Hi Al, I suspect any menu system that doesn't use the elements recommended
for navigation menu's since last century (i.e at least HTML 2.0) could be
considered semantically incorrect.
I'll l
From: "Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] [OT] Flyout Menu (Semantically correct plus more
...)
I could be completely wrong here, and I am sure you will tell me so
if
that's the case.
But I wo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Sparber
> Sent: Thursday, 19 January 2006 10:48 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] [OT] Flyout Menu (Semantically correct
> plus more ...)
>
> From: &q
From: "Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:59 PM
Subject: [WSG] [OT] Flyout Menu (Semantically correct plus more ...)
I had a look at all the options and found all of them were very
bulky in
code and very difficult to understand, except to the
