On 28 Feb 2006, at 7:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
278 errors and 799 warnings on the index page alone.
Provided you have javascript for the redirect into the cms =)
AIMIA site aside, a quick look through some of the entrants is quite
encouraging compared to some awards sites I've seen
Hi Kat,
Completely agree with you. I have been member with AIMIA for a couple of
years, but to be honest I didn't quite get out of it what I was hoping for.
In my opinion they are blowing the Accessibility Trumpet without knowing how
to read the notes.
Being probably the No.1 association in
278 errors and 799 warnings on the index page alone.
- Original Message -
From: Kat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: [WSG] AIMIA Awards
Gday,
I find this list filled with dynamic, inspirational people. I come away
Kat wrote:
Gday,
I find this list filled with dynamic, inspirational people. I come
away being motivated and energised. I love youse guys. :)
Today, I came across AIMIA (Australian Interactive Media Industry
Association - http://www.aimia.com.au/) that are having their 12th
Annual AIMIA
I am going to the Awards ceremony at the Adelaide Convention Centre as
my work was given some invites. I'm interested to see what sort of role
standards has played in the finalists projects and I'll be sure to ask
lots of annoying questions if I get the chance!
Sifting through the finalists
Further investigation shows that there are a few finalists that have
somewhat adhered to standards, but hardly to the level of satisfaction
that many WSG regulars would want. I think they're missing a category:
BEST ACCESSIBILITY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On 2/28/06, Miles Tillinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think they're missing a category:
BEST ACCESSIBILITY
That's just one of the reasons why Port80 ran the inaugural WA Web
Awards last year (http://www.wawebawards.com.au). Standards and
Accessbility was one of the categories and although not
