http://www.hwg.org/resources/faqs/ratesFAQ.html
perhaps this will be useful, maybe not.
But the discussion has been found inappropriate for the list. I apologize for
continuing it, but just wanted to share a link I had on the topic.
ByteDreams
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
What you charge depends on a whole range of factors but these are the
main ones.
- The local going rate
- The type of clients you deal with
- How good you are at what you do
- Your overheads
Obviously a large agency with flash premises in the Middle of London
dealing with blue chip clients are g
On 7/21/04 3:42 PM "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this
out:
> Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is a topic for discussion...
> http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
I agree, FWIW.
Rick
*
The discussion li
I didn't think there would be a problem discussing this issue...
I was actually quite interested in seeing how you all charge your
clients and on what basis.
Sometimes I charge a flat fee - kind of a contract.
Say - $3000 and I set it all up from start to finish.
But two days ago I scored my
This discussion may be OK or not in certain countries, but it doesn't
have much to with web standards.
Let's close the thread now please. Guys, feel free to discuss it with
each other offlist or in another appropriate forum.
>Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>
>> Call me overly cautious, but I don't thi
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is a topic for
discussion...
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
You're overly cautious. There's a huge difference between discussing
what goes into setting a price or expressing opinion on what is a valid
pric
While in some countries it imay be considered illegal to even discuss
prices for services, unless laws have changed in the last few years it
is not illegal in Australia or the EU. Actual price fixing may be, but
professionals discussing how to work out what to charge and what to
charge for is n
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is
a topic for discussion...
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
Patrick H. Lauke
__re·dux
(adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively. [latin : re-,