Thanks Gunlag
I think you are right about semantics there. I don't have to have it
as a Sub-nav I guess. I will see how much trouble I have getting this
to work in IE; if it doesn't work I will definitely put it back to the
way you have suggested. I'm not terrible happy about using absolute
positi
Sorry, yes Phillip. I haven't done PC testing at all yet, I'm on
Firefox on the Mac. Wanted to decide how to code this before I get
onto testing.
Should have mentioned that!
Cheers
On 02/08/07, Philip Kiff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Collins wrote:
> > I've spent a while trying to figure t
Paul Collins wrote:
> I've spent a while trying to figure this out and I'm not sure there is
> a solution. I've got two levels of navigation here; visually one sits
> on top of the other, but the second level will change according to
> what top level link you click:
> http://www.method.com.au/newWe
Paul Collins wrote:
http://www.method.com.au/newWebsite/
... The problem is that semantically this is not correct, the second
level here is relating to the home link and therefore should be a
sub-list contained in the of the home link. If you look at my
example link, this is how the code appea
Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
...snippy snippy...
Sorry for the long email, but my basic question is, does anyone have
another suggestion of positioning that second level nav without taking
it out of the document flow?
Thanks for any help!
Paul
Hi Paul,
Your menu seems fine when I resiz
