things...
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wasabi
Sent: Tuesday, 24 August 2004 2:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Flash in Windows Mozilla 1.6
Hi,
Yes it does work in Win2K, I've tested a couple of WSG award winning
Hi,
Ha, Ha home some coffee will Ya. Have a good one your humor lightened
my somber mood.
W
On Monday, August 23, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Kim Kruse wrote:
No... I meant between the tags. (I was only trying to be funny...
not very successfully though. End of story from my end)
Kim
Wasabi wrote:
Hi
No... I meant between the tags. (I was only trying to be funny...
not very successfully though. End of story from my end)
Kim
Wasabi wrote:
Hi,
Do you mean the white box where the flash doc should be?
C
On Monday, August 23, 2004, at 09:52 AM, Kim Kruse wrote:
"I'm not going to invalidate my pag
Hi,
Do you mean the white box where the flash doc should be?
C
On Monday, August 23, 2004, at 09:52 AM, Kim Kruse wrote:
"I'm not going to invalidate my pages with Macromedia's code however.
"... that would probably have saved you from all the whitespace though
:o)
Kim
Wasabi wrote:
Hi,
Yes it
"I'm not going to invalidate my pages with Macromedia's code however.
"... that would probably have saved you from all the whitespace though :o)
Kim
Wasabi wrote:
Hi,
Yes it does work in Win2K, I've tested a couple of WSG award winning
sites, they have the same issue, I've tested using the meth
Hi,
Yes it does work in Win2K, I've tested a couple of WSG award winning
sites, they have the same issue, I've tested using the method
and writing dynamically with JS, no luck. I'm not going to invalidate
my pages with Macromedia's code however.
C
On Monday, August 23, 2004, at 08:28 AM, Patri
Does it use features specific to Flash7, and Browser Cam only has
6? (as I don't use Browser Cam I'm not sure if that last bit actually
applies, but thought I'd throw that in as a potential cause)
Work for me anyway on Win2k/Moz1.6/Flash7
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
