On Jan 10, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:As a result, the last button of my main navigation is dropping down to the next line. We had this a lot. For us, it was a matter of making sure the actual content didn't exceed the available width of the content's container (possibly 'wrapper', if yo
Thanks Scott and Paulo, those were excellent definitions. I understand it a lot better now. So back to fiddling for a while.
Cheers,
Seona.
#sizer {width:_expression_(document.body.clientWidth
> 1554 ? "402px" : "75%" );}
I would prefer not to have to fiddle with the proportions of the
buttons just for IE, so would it be possible for someone to translate
that _expression_ into plain english for me so I can fiddle with the
number
Seona Bellamy wrote:
> #sizer {width:expression(document.body.clientWidth > 1554 ? "402px" :
"75%" );}
> would it be possible for someone to translate that expression into plain
english for me
Hi Seona
Hope this clarifies.
The expression says:
"If the body/viewport[1] width is greater than 1554
On 11/01/06, Duckworth, Nigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Can anyone who is running a
larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is
holding up?
Looks
good at 1600-1000px. Scrollbar appears at 999px.
-Nigel
Thanks Nigel. That's exactly where the scr
On 11/01/06, Thomas Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:
Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is holding up?
Sorry no time to peek, but I am using this on a current project...#si
Title: Message
>
Can anyone who is running a
larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is
holding up?
Looks
good at 1600-1000px. Scrollbar appears at 999px.
-Nigel
On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is holding up? Sorry no time to peek, but I am using this on a current project...#sizer {width:_expression_(document.body.clientWidth > 1554 ? "40
On 1/10/06, Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm seeing in IE6 is a fixed width layout that is centered at
> resolutions above 1024x768. I'm also seeing a horizontal scrollbar on
> my second monitor at 1024x768 (maximised), so it seems the width might
> need to be 1 or 2 pixels less.
On 1/10/06, Seona Bellamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a
> look and tell me if the layout is holding up?
>
> Even better, can someone explain to me what the code in this conditional
> comment is doing in the first place? Acco
On 09/01/06, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't had a look at your page in IE win but noticed one thing inthe source code.In your conditional comment, the width of the _expression_ is set to anegative % value. Don't think that is correct.
>
Hmm... good point. This was code g
On 9 Jan 2006, at 9:18 am, Seona Bellamy wrote:
I've used the Jello Mold Creator at Position Is Everything to
handle the
sizing issues for the site I'm redeveloping. Seems to be working
fine in
Firefox, but when I opened it in IE I found that it was far too
wide. Ugly
sideways scrolling, c
12 matches
Mail list logo
