Nedlud wrote:
Hi people,
I see that the Australian government has required all government
agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility
I work for a non profit organisation that receives government funding, but
I am unaware of our
Thanks for that Kerry.
On 24 February 2010 14:17, Webb, KerryA kerrya.w...@act.gov.au wrote:
Nedlud wrote:
Hi people,
I see that the Australian government has required all government
agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility
Does this mean the moral obligation alone is not compelling enough for your
organisation to be convinced to follow the requirement, and they will only
do so if there is a danger of legal issues?
sp. ( in a similar situation).
.
Lucien wrote:
I work for a
That's exactly what it means ;)
Sad but true.
Resources ... blah blah ... deadlines ... blah blah ... too much work ..
blah blah ...
I suspect it's a familiar story to many.
L.
On 24 February 2010 14:59, sans principles sans.princip...@gmail.comwrote:
Does this mean the moral obligation
Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide
accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be held
responsible and found negligent and be required to pay compensation as
directed by a court of law.
Ref case : Maguire vs. SOCOG
Jason wrote:
Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide
accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be held
responsible and found negligent and be required to pay compensation as
directed by a court of law.
Ref case : Maguire vs. SOCOG
Indeed, nor if you supply an alternative source of information.
Sent from my iPhone
On 24/02/2010, at 4:28 PM, Webb, KerryA kerrya.w...@act.gov.au
wrote:
Jason wrote:
Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to
provide accessibility aspects and compliance within a
