On 2/1/06, Peter Ottery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cant replicate it here using firefox 1.0.2 and win xp. you may have
> fixed it..?
Nope, but it occurs less frequently on FF1.0.x/XP than on other OSs,
and I've only actually looked at it in Firefox 1.0.7 in XP (I figured
it'd be relatively con
Joshua wrote:
> Launched a website [ http://yahoo7.com.au/sunrise/family/ ]
and
> the BIGGEST problem (so far as I'm concerned) is with Firefox 1.0.x on the
> "Meet the Family" page [http://sunrisefamily.com.au/current/content/meet/ ]
I cant replicate it here using firefox 1.0.2 and win xp. you ma
Mmm, just had a look in latest Opera 9 beta and concluded that it's
most definitely beta software for a reason ;-) On another page,
overflow:auto doesn't work because there are floating form elements,
which the engine doesn't seem to want to let layout push down
(because, obviously, things are floa
Many thanks. I'd only tested Opera in 8.5x (because, IMO, it's
reasonable to assume if people are using Opera they're probably going
to be people who bother upgrading their software!), so I'll be sure to
take a look :-)
On 1/30/06, Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/30/06, Joshua Stre
On 1/30/06, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Still keen to hear anyone's suggestions as to the Firefox 1.0.x render
> problem... :)
>
> Josh
Hi Josh,
While on the topic of rendering bugs I just thought I would mention
that in Opera 9 beta there is some funky stuff happening with the
s
> Joshua Street wrote:
> Still keen to hear anyone's suggestions as to the Firefox 1.0.x render
> problem... :)
> http://sunrisefamily.com.au/current/content/meet/
No problems seen using Firefox 1.07 on XP Pro.
Regards
Jason
**
The discussion l
On 1/30/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > I'm assured it's not going to move!
>
> I wouldn't believe that. In fact, here's a perfect example of why 301
> shouldn't have been used. On Today Tonight (another 7 network program,
> for those of you not in Australia
Joshua Street wrote:
Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of the URI structure either. It's running on
a Zeus web server, which has some weird-ass mod_rewrite equivalent,
but I'm not comfortable enough with it to use it. As for why 301
redirects, I explicitly asked for that after carefully explaining that
it
Yeah, I'm not a huge fan of the URI structure either. It's running on
a Zeus web server, which has some weird-ass mod_rewrite equivalent,
but I'm not comfortable enough with it to use it. As for why 301
redirects, I explicitly asked for that after carefully explaining that
it couldn't EVER be moved
Joshua Street wrote:
http://sunrisefamily.com.au/current/content/
The site looks good, it's a huge improvement over all the other 7
network web sites.
However, one issue I have with it is why when I go to:
http://sunrisefamily.com.au/
I get a 301 Moved Permanently pointing to:
http://sunris
10 matches
Mail list logo
