On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:48:40 +1100, russ - maxdesign
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://news.com.com/Mozillaaimsformobilebrowsermarket/2100-1032_3-5483683.html
I'd like to note that this news is disinformative. You could think that
there isn't
any browser that reformats pages, zooms images and
On 1 Dec 2004, at 4:13 am, Chris Kennon wrote:
Would you explain the abbreviation IR and what is the name, and where
can I read about this rule:
a[href]:focus {-moz-outline: 2px solid -moz-mac-focusring;}
IR stands for Image Replacement - like the FIR or sFir methods, where
CSS (and/or Js) is us
The problem with declaring all three in one is that IE 5 (possibly 5.5
also, can't remember which right now) for PC chokes on any declaration
that contains :focus. Combining your :active and :focus rules will
effectively cancel that entire declaration in dodgy old IE.
oh, dodgy old IE :/
remember
ECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2004 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Focus highlighting, was Re: [WSG] Some links for light
reading (30/11/04)
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
> The problem with d
> Hmm...it doesn't seem to affect IE 5 or 5.5 (admittedly using skyx' multiple
> IE installations on a Win2k machine natively running 6) on
> www.salford.ac.uk
> though. Maybe just depends on a variety of factors, not sure...
Hmmm indeed ;)
When I get home from work I'll find the exact bug and l
Same results here for IE (similar set up) on my own test page, and I
don't see any bugs in Opera 7PC, 7.5MAC normal and SSR mode.
Opera's SSR is pretty aggressive and not many styles (if any) stick, so
the lack of :focus support in this mode is to be expected as a feature,
not a bug.
Terrence
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
The problem with declaring all three in one is that IE 5 (possibly 5.5
also, can't remember which right now) for PC chokes on any declaration
that contains :focus. Combining your :active and :focus rules will
effectively cancel that entire declaration in dodgy old IE
Hmm...i
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:19 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
> >
> > And you can group the above and save yourself repetition. In one
> > of my stylesheets, for instance, I have
> >
> > #navbar li a:focus,
> > #navbar li a:hover,
> > #navbar a:active {
> > background: #fbfbfb;
> > }
>
> I se
I interpreted 'IR' to stand for 'image replacement', such as FIR and sFIR et
al.
Cheers,
Kevin Futter
On 1/12/04 7:50 AM, "Terrence Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what IR refers to. Here's the the CSS rule explained:
>
--
Kevin Futter
Webmaster, St. Bernard's College
http://
The only problem I'm aware of is that you lose the ability to provide
feedback the a link has been activated.
If this is important then send IE it's own active rule:
* html a:active{}
cheers
Terrence Wood.
On 2004-12-01 4:50 AM, Derek Featherstone wrote:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:19 AM, P
I'm not sure what IR refers to. Here's the the CSS rule explained:
a[href]:focus { /* select any anchor with an attribute href that has
focus */
-moz-outline: /* mozilla implementation of a non standard, or non
ratified CSS property. see below for explantion. Outline creates a
border around the
Hi,
Would you explain the abbreviation IR and what is the name, and where
can I read about this rule:
a[href]:focus {-moz-outline: 2px solid -moz-mac-focusring;}
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, at 05:38 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
IR techniques.
a[href]:focus {-moz-outline: 2px solid -moz-mac
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:19 AM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
>
> And you can group the above and save yourself repetition. In one
> of my stylesheets, for instance, I have
>
> #navbar li a:focus,
> #navbar li a:hover,
> #navbar a:active {
> background: #fbfbfb;
> }
I seem to recall Tommy talk
So, please, please, if you want to make your sites more accessible to
keyboard users, add :focus and :active rules to match your :hover rule.
ok, I will :)
a:focus {color: #346095; background-color:#fff;}
a:hover {color: #346095; background-color:#fff;}
a:active {color: #346095; background-color:#
> From: Derek Featherstone
[...]
> Right, however, IE (mistakenly, I suspect) treats :active the same as
> :focus.
> For example:
>
> a:focus {color: #346095; background-color:#fff;}
> a:hover {color: #346095; background-color:#fff;}
> a:active {color: #346095; background-color:#fff;}
Good poin
Sorry about that -- it appears that pressing enter while holding down the
control key sends the message ( a new keystroke I didn't know about...)
Here's the complete message I was trying to send:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:09 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
>Does that really matter?
Yes, foc
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:09 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
>Does that really matter?
Yes, focus highlighting does matter. I come across this daily -- and I'm a
keyboard user by choice...
>In Firefox and IE there is a focus border anyway.
Which isn't exactly prominent - it provides a
> From: Kornel Lesinski
>Does that really matter?
>
>In Firefox and IE there is a focus border anyway.
Which is not always visible, depending on specific background colour and or
background pattern/image
>IE doesn't support :focus or outlines, so there isn't much
> you can help.
W
Hi,
Where can I read up on these accessibility issues you've outlined?
C
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, at 06:09 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
Does that really matter?
In Firefox and IE there is a focus border anyway.
IE doesn't support :focus or outlines, so there isn't much you can
help.
In F
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:09:23 -, Kornel Lesinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Does that really matter?
>
>In Firefox and IE there is a focus border anyway.
>IE doesn't support :focus or outlines, so there isn't much you can help.
> In Firefox Cursor-Mode (F7) uses small text-curso
Does that really matter?
In Firefox and IE there is a focus border anyway.
IE doesn't support :focus or outlines, so there isn't much you can help.
In Firefox Cursor-Mode (F7) uses small text-cursor that isn't good for bad
sighted people anyway.
Opera with spatial navigation always adds bac
On 30 Nov 2004, at 10:25 pm, russ - maxdesign wrote:
This article has a very interesting comment:
"An important detail, which most people forget, is to add rules for
a:focus.
Users who can't or won't use a mouse can jump from link to link with
the Tab
key or similar. For them it is important that
Looks great in a Panther version of Safari, but in Safari 1 it falls
apart. The navigation in particular. I guess partly because it relies
entirely on CSS for the dropdown menus, providing a separate stylesheet
link and Javascript for IE PC.
-Hugh Todd
EDS goes full CSS:
http://www.eds.com/
***
sorry, of course:
Valid Flash example for XHTML 1.0 Strict
johannes
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Some links for light reading (17
I just tested the site in Mozilla and it looks fine, but in Netscape 7.02
all the elements are pushed down when you mouseover the top level navbar.
Maybe it's just me :)
> Looks good in netscape 7.1
>
> On 11/17/2004 7:30:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > EDS has certainly gone with CSS, and t
Looks good in netscape 7.1
On 11/17/2004 7:30:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> EDS has certainly gone with CSS, and the site is clean, simple, and
> engaging, but someone forgot to test the site in Netscape 7.02 because
> the
> navbar is producing a nasty effect.
>
> Mario
>
>
>
> > EDS goes full
EDS has certainly gone with CSS, and the site is clean, simple, and
engaging, but someone forgot to test the site in Netscape 7.02 because the
navbar is producing a nasty effect.
Mario
> EDS goes full CSS:
> http://www.eds.com/
>
> More on EDS's launch:
> http://web-graphics.com/mtarchive/00145
Russ, as always, a fascinating set of links. thanks!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
I found Mike's article on browser/standards evolution to be really
though-provoking.
I love his point about having the rendering engine of a browser (not the
interface) easily upgraded
like what occurs with each new version of Flash.
What does everyone else think? Does browser development need
On 5/28/04 11:39 AM "Russ Weakley - Maxdesign" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent
this out:
> An excellent 3D diagram of the box model:
> http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/journal/2004/05/3d_css_box_model/
[snips]
Just so you know I appreciate your links... thanks!
Rick
***
<>
Compared to IE -- no. Compared to anything else -- yes.
<>
I believe your Opera problem results from the use of the height attribute.
Your "Main" div, set to overflow, actually runs passed the 100% height of
the viewport and in Opera7.11 that means the left and right floats end, so
the c
Yep. Just a little nit-picking. Hence I just said it was ironic, and that
it was close.
Does anyone actually use Opera? I've tried it in the past, but found that
it had too many problems with too many sits (not only ones I built).
I'm open to suggestions about how I can fix the problem you saw
Bert wrote:
Very interesting
I do find it ironic that a page talking about Microsoft's lack of standards
support does not validate. Close, but no cigar.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
www.betterwebdesign.com.au
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
___
Very interesting
I do find it ironic that a page talking about Microsoft's lack of standards
support does not validate. Close, but no cigar.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
www.betterwebdesign.com.au
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
When you say that www.fhm.lv is a "nice" css site,
what exactly do you mean Russ? :oP
--
Cameron
W: www.themaninblue.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
**
35 matches
Mail list logo
