On 01/03/2010, at 8:44 AM, Sam Dwyer dwyer@abc.net.au wrote:
Hope some of that helps.
(Hi to the mailing list by the way, this is my first post since I
joined, look forward to engaging with you all)
Thanks Sam and welcome, great to get your perspective on TinyMCE, if
you ever do dig
I haven't had much of a look at the new CKEditor version but I was mightily
impressed with the initial glance I had at it when he first released it. It
looks like a *major* improvement on the original fckeditor. Cleaner code, more
accessible and easier, cleaner ability to add plugins. If I was
I'd be also be curious to learn more about any editors that can use a site's
CSS. Just spent a day with FCKEditor only to find that there appears to be
no way to have site CSS appear in the Style dropdown, w/o transforming the
CSS into XML.
For about 5 years, I've used InnovaStudio because it
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Kepler Gelotte
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Standards based Drupal WYSIWYG Editor
Just spent a day with FCKEditor only
We make extensive use of TinyMCE with Drupal (we're a Drupal development
shop) - it's not perfect, but it does offer a lot of flexibility
regarding acceptable tags, and we've been able to get it to provide
XHTML compliant code. Combined with filters like Tidy, it's possible to
ensure that you
Sent: 26 February 2010 19:37
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Standards based Drupal WYSIWYG Editor
We make extensive use of TinyMCE with Drupal (we're a Drupal development
shop) - it's not perfect, but it does offer a lot of flexibility regarding
acceptable tags, and we've been able
Hi James,
On 27 February 2010 03:30, James O'Neill freexe...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not at all happy with the FCK editor. I am
starting to look at Time MCE and Standard.
When you say FCK editor do you mean the current version?
Now called CKEditor.
Broadly, I’m very interested to hear
