yes, good point.
I was making a subtle stab at the .htm versus .html discussion in here
recently.
but given my 'druthers, yes, I'd personally drop all file extensions
in URLs completely if I could.
Joe
On 05/11/2008, at 4:04 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
the long and f
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
the long and friendly URL is really for the final page, which should not
bury a full product list so deeply and should be titled
/product_list.html anyway.
Uh, how about more properly '/product_list' (or '/product-list') --
your customers don't care about the underlying '.
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2008 3:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Sorry for being a bit off topic but.
I think you missed a point about friendly URLs
F
: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Sorry for being a bit off topic but.
>
> I think you missed a point about friendly URLs
> For each of these examples you state, you really don't want to burden
Please stop emailing me!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2008 3:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Sorry for being a bit off topic
Sorry for being a bit off topic but.
I think you missed a point about friendly URLs
For each of these examples you state, you really don't want to burden
your marketing team with urls like your example:
www.chrisandhispetstore.com/what_i_keep_in_stock/supplies_for_birds/cages_and_ornaments/ful
From: "silky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Todd Budnikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
i completely agree with Justin, and all points from ju
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Todd Budnikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i completely agree with Justin, and all points from just about everyone who
> responded, so thanks. A follow-up question is then do you paraphrase an
> article title into a url, or just chop it?
> /music/a-fresh-and-powerful
c=001/003/001.
Both URLs take you to the same location.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chris Vickery
Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2008 12:41
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
More
day, 5 November 2008 12:41
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
More reasons to keep 'em short:
1. Makes it easy to quote URL (maybe over the phone) 2. I've seen a few
email or publication programs break URLs where there'
More reasons to keep 'em short:
1. Makes it easy to quote URL (maybe over the phone)
2. I've seen a few email or publication programs break URLs where there's a
line return, so breaks the hyperlink
3. Makes layout difficult for desktop publishers and marketing ie.
www.chrisandhispetstore.com/what
11 matches
Mail list logo
