Re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-30 Thread Randall Potter
Alan Trick wrote: snip It is possible to get ASP.NET to give you compliant code. /snip Therein lies the rub in my opinion. Isn't the tool supposed to make your task easier? Who do you want in control, the designer/coder or the IDE? Would you in fact tolerate that level of fiddling with

Re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-29 Thread Alan Trick
Actually, Tatham was kind of right in a way. It is possible to get ASP.NET to give you compliant code. However, compliance and web standards are *not* the same thing. Compliance is only part of web standards (and one of the smallest IMHO). Take for example the Internet explorer blog on msdn.com

re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread csslist
Have you ever seen anything that microsoft makes that makes anything near compliant code? didnt think so If you are going to use .net and want complient code then you will spend a lot of time going back and tweaking the code to get it to comply. From: Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday,

RE: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Tatham Oddie \(Fuel Advance\)
Idea www.fueladvance.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 10:34 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility Have you ever seen anything

RE: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread csslist
Your Idea www.fueladvance.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of csslist Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 10:34 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility Have you ever seen anything that microsoft makes