Amit Karmakar wrote:
The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org
CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css
It's pretty late over here, and I only brushed over the stuff but
#navcontainer
{
float: left;
width: 199px;
border-right: 1px solid #B4D3DC;
padding: 0 0 1em 0;
Hello!
This is my first message to the list, first of all, sorry my bad english,
I'm spanish.
The site seems to be working fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody
IE
Any help to get it working in IE v6/Win would be appreciated.
People on macs would you mind giving me your feedback too.
They are right - you dont need width: 100%
the only adverse effect that will have - now you wont see the HOVER
Effect unless you hover over the TEXT and not the BOX
in IE ONLY...
Most other browsers this will work still...
NOTE:
Im only fairly sure what I said is true.
I have been in
Thanks Jose works like a charm!
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jose Florido
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6
Hello!
This is my first
Thanks Ryan!
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Christie
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6
Amit Karmakar wrote:
The site:
You now have a problem that it doesnt
look correct in IE5 without the 100%
So maybe do something like in the
actual page:
!--[if IE 5]
style type=text/css media=screen#navcontainer li a{width: 100%;}/style![endif]--
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Ph: 02 9570 9875
Im starting to create a Fluid CSS design, which im finding to be quite and arse
in IE...
But anyways, i've got the basic layout created, but i would now like to have a
min-width, but just cant think of a way of getting it to work in IE.
So what im asking is... Does anyone know a min-width work
http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
On 6/7/04 1:26 AM Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
So people don't actually answer questions here, they perform google searches
for you?
Cool! ;-)
Rick Faaberg
*
The discussion list
well its not bad to perform a search for you :P
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 01:35:46 -0700, Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/04 1:26 AM Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
So people don't actually answer questions here, they
WinSyntax for winsucks
BlueFish for mandrake
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:17:55 +1000, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
I have started a new category on the WSG site call Development and
design tools. I think at this point it would be a good idea for
everyone to login and start
This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correct
inside a table. Instead of thinking of ways to convert it into divs, you
should be working on implementing accessibility features:
id, headers for, summary, caption, etc.
A rough example if id's and headers in action is here:
thank you Russ
you know what! I feel like you are the only one who can understand
What web is and what Web standards is
heh
Thank you mate
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:07:57 +1000, Russ Weakley - Maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correct
Thank you guys
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:21:36 +1000, Mark Stanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jad
That really looks like table data to me so I think its best to keep
it in tables. Tables are not evil in and of themselves, in fact they
are very useful in cases like yours. Its just when they
Well said, mate. There's no need to convert to divs because you're using a
table as it should be used.
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Russ Weakley - Maxdesign
Is it just me, or does it take a good quarter of an hour for emails
to appear on the list?
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
*
The discussion list for
winsyntax
http://www.WinSyntax.com
by the way
we are having three threads today for editors :-)
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 21:38:04 +0200, Kristof Neirynck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
noa wrote:
Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic insertion.
hmm seems that
things are fine with me
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:38:44 +0100, Patrick Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it just me, or does it take a good quarter of an hour for emails
to appear on the list?
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University
I'd wondered at that, Pat. At first joining I was double posting.
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer ()
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Patrick Lauke
Sent: 07 June 2004 11:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys
Please address all issues related to the running of the list to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We are really trying to keep the noise on this list
down to a mimimum and keep discussion to web standards related issues.
If everyone could help it would be great and the list managers
wouldn't feel so
Hi everyone,
Please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOT the list. If need be I'll post
relevant discussion somewhere.
At the bottom of all posts (well most as it doesn't get added when people send
horrible HTML email) there is a link to the guidelines. The link is
People,
My apologoes in advance if this has been discussed earlier.
I know there are sites that let you test your sites on different
browsers(browsers, version, OS).
Something like http://browsers.evolt.org/, www.danvine.com/iecapture/
but are there softwares (online or offline) that lets users
VMware is my second bet
or Virtual PC
Camz
- Original Message -
From: Amit Karmakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:19 AM
Subject: [WSG] Many Browers in one place
People,
My apologoes in advance if this has been discussed earlier.
I know
Hmmm, neither seem free though :(
http://www.browsercam.com/
http://www.vmware.com/
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Stanton
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 10:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I tried to add a 'sublevel' to the exisiting lists in order to bring out
the second level.
Works fine in Opera/Win Mozilla/Win
But shows gaps in IE in the subnavlists.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks people.
URL: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm
CSS
Hi All
Anyone got any decent pointers for Netscape 6 CSS problems? I'm
finalising a site works great in IE6, 5.5, 5, NS7, Safari, Mozilla etc.
etc. However, NS6 is simply a mess.
Have scoured the web but always draw a blank.
Kind regards
Martin Chapman Fromm
--
Web development, identity and
Title: RE: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
What's the problem though captain?
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 June 2004 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
Hi All
Anyone got any decent
Martin,
Be careful with DocTypes.
NS6 adds white-space after objects.
Anymore than that I'd need an example url.
mike 2k:)2
-Original Message-
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 June 2004 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
Hi All
From: Martin Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/06/07 Mon AM 11:44:41 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
Hi All
Anyone got any decent pointers for Netscape 6 CSS problems? I'm
finalising a site works great in IE6, 5.5, 5, NS7, Safari, Mozilla etc.
etc.
Hi list :)
I've got every other quirk squashed except this unordered list one.
Is there a way to reposition the unordered list while keeping the square
bullets where they're supposed to be, or will I have to fake this
with a background image? I've gotten the text to move where it's
supposed to
Dan Cederholm is the author of Web Standards Solutions: The Markup and Style
Handbook as well as many articles on standards-based design for publications
such as A List Apart . Dan also runs the popular weblog SimpleBits , where
he writes articles and commentary on the web, technology and life.
Is there a trick that I haven't learned yet with regard to WAI Recommendation 10.5; to
wit:
10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links
distinctly, include
non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links.
[Priority 3]
The reason
One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still make sense?
If I have gathered correctly what Russ and others said in the linearization thread,
would it make
more sense to have the columnar data in the rows, and vice-versa? That way, when the
data is
linearized, it will flow
One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still make sense?
In the case of properly coded (read: with correct table headings, scope, etc)
data tables, meaningful linearisation should be taken care of by the user agent.
Don't worry about it...this should not, in my view anyway,
This is arguably an obsolete rule. I would posit that it does not
apply to cases in which links are contained within completely
separate block level elements (e.g. unordered lists' items). It is,
however, good practice to still use some sort of separator (pipe,
or even a non-breaking space
Hi
Netscape 6 is not a stable browser, it's built off Mozilla alpha code
(i.e about 0.9) (v7 is a branch off Mozilla 1.1, I believe). There is a
thread on this topic about a month or two back with some links to the
Mozilla roadmap - try a search at mail-archive.com
The 6 was put in for
Hi
As I posted before, let's put these up on the WSG website, not on the
list. An archive would contribute better to the group and are the posts
are now tending to just take up bandwidth now on the list as we are just
getting a pile of emails with links in them.
Cheers
James
Jad Madi wrote:
Henry,
Weird, but it works!! Thanks for helping me out. Appreciate that.
http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Henry Tapia
Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2004
Title: Ordered list mark-up
Hi guys,
I was wondering if you could tell me how to mark-up an ordered list using CSS so that the bullets are enclosed in parenthesis, e.g.
(a) Text piece 1
(b) Whatever
Thanks
Bhuvnesh Chaudhry
Thats funny Mark..
I happened to hit Froogle by accident after following that link and look
what I found..
http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=min-width%20IEhl=enlr=ie=UTF-8sa=Ntab=wf
Good to see Westciv in there. eh John?
Regards
Chris Blown
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 18:26, Mark Stanton wrote:
Indiscrepancies = cross between indiscretions and discrepancies?
:-)
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
*
The discussion list for
G'day
Well, the specs appear to have provision for it. Unfortunately the vast
majority of browsers do not (yet) seem to support it.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN
HTML
HEAD
TITLEContent alignment in the marker box/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css
LI:before {
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:07:36 -0600, RC Pierce wrote:
One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still
make sense?
snip
nbsp; = Disk Space = Bandwidth = c.; =
Bronze = 400 MB = 7 GB = c.; =
Silver = c.; =
Gold = c.; =
Platinum = c.;
I haven't looked at the source of the
Title: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
Hey guys. Yerba Buena Web Design (my own small design agency, which hasn't even officially opened yet) has created two IE 7 Promo Images. Dean Edwards modified the first one (to fit his layout and design) and made it the official IE 7 Logo.
Title: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
Im having trouble understanding how you think IE7
would be broken?!
I wouldnt abuse IE7 to be broken without it
actually being released yet. It might shock you ;)
Microsoft have said their putting more time and
manpower into IE7 than previous versions...
On 8 Jun 2004 03:39:27 +, Sean M. Hall (Dante) wrote:
I'd like your opinion on these two images (please remember that I'm a
beginner at design).
Could replies to Sean on this topic please go directly to him?
Sean,
This is not a general web/ graphic design list, perhaps you'd like to
go
I'm using the recommended accessible way to open a new browser window (yes, I know but
it's an elearning module and we have to link out to internal content so learners can
view reference material without losing their place, plus they are quite used to this
method).
However, I'm finding that if
Title: RE: [WSG] new window losing it's anchor place
Hi Wendy
1. Where is #how_work on the page?
2. You should also add onkeypress=window.open(this.href, 'popupwindow', 'toolbar=yes,location=yes,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=300,height=300'); return false; just
Title: RE: [WSG] new window losing it's anchor place
Not
sure how onkeypress would interfere with other similar links on the page - the
link can be tabbed to and therefore works via keyboard only.
The
page that opens in the new window has a number of anchor links - this is just
one of
49 matches
Mail list logo