Well, hmmm I try it with java disabled in IE, and it still works.
2005/12/9, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/8/05, Matthew Cruickshank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Srecko Micic wrote:
But what if Java is disabled in browser ?
Then it won't work anyway, because all methods I've
On 12/9/05, Srecko Micic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, hmmm I try it with java disabled in IE, and it still works.
That's what I thought.
Of course, if your users don't have DirectX, the filter won't work,
but what's the likelihood of that?
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ...
Definitly .htaccess
2005/12/9, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
.htaccess maybe?
On 12/9/05, Paul Noone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not so. It depends on Apache and how it's configured.
You can check how PHP is set up by creating a new PHP page and just inlcude
the following:
?php
Surely either you jest, didn't read the whole article or need to update your
feeds. ;)
From the article itself:
This is a spoof article. Please compare it with the original and you will
see how little it has been changed.
From the blogosphere:
http://www.forgetfoo.com/?blogid=5150
On 09/12/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/12/2005, at 10:29 PM, James Ellis wrote:
Having a valid frontend has nothing to do with whether an
organisation attempts to be socially responsible. I'm sure there
are heaps of slightly dodgy organisations out there that hire
Title: Out of Office AutoReply: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Good Day!
I will be out of the office December 9 for the Capstrat annual meeting.
If you require an immediate response please contact me on my cell phone: 919-475-7706.
Otherwise I will respond to your email on Monday.
On 12/9/05, Collin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surely either you jest, didn't read the whole article or need to update your
feeds. ;)
Sorry, I should have made it more clear I was kidding. They do remind
me of that article though :)
--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ...
On 10/12/2005, at 1:20 AM, matt andrews wrote:
Hi Lea, I completely agree. Google have somehow developed a blind
spot when it comes to meeting even the basics of current web
standards. As an exercise, I just threw together a valid version of
the Google Search page:
blog entry:
On 12/9/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/2005, at 1:20 AM, matt andrews wrote:
Hi Lea, I completely agree. Google have somehow developed a blind
spot when it comes to meeting even the basics of current web
standards. As an exercise, I just threw together a valid version
...
I thought about doing that, but decided I didn't have time.
Interestingly, comparing the two pages in
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/
shows the original is *slightly* lighter (but I bet you could beat
that by removing more carriage returns, same as the original)
...
Can't recall seeing an answer to this post, so I thought I'd have
a look at the issue.
Eg. http://www.business.ecu.edu.au/schools/mtl/staff/index.htm and
http://www.business.ecu.edu.au/schools/mtl/staff/spettigrew.htm
In IE I get the 3px jog and in FF dd's that are shorter than their
Michael Cordover's comments were the correct answer. :)Here is an excerpt from an Interview with Matt Cutts, Google engineer, just last month:Q: In more general terms, what do you think is the relationship between Google and the W3C? Do you think it would be important for Google to
e.g. be
Chris Dimmock wrote:
*Google's home page doesn't
validate and that's mostly by design to save precious bytes.
So, he's saying
font color=red loads faster than font color=red
?
I'd like to see some documented proof of this.
The homepage of google is only a couple lines of code... but yet
Multiply those two by millions of hits every day
and we're talking big bandwidth!
--- Brian Cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Dimmock wrote:
*Google's home page doesn't
validate and that's mostly by design to save
precious bytes.
So, he's saying
font color=red loads
Francesco wrote:
Multiply those two by millions of hits every day
and we're talking big bandwidth!
Good point. I didn't even think about it like that.
I wonder how many visits google gets in a day...
**
The discussion list for
I wonder how many visits Google gets in a day...?
Brian - I'm not sure how many visits Google gets in a day,but Danny Sullivan reported on the Nielsen netratings numbers back in Julythat Google has 46.2%market share of 4.5 billion searches/ month
On 12/9/05, Chris Dimmock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either way - small coding issues (and vaildation/ use of semantic code etc)
are going to mean a lot of bandwidth when looked at in light of that kind of
volume...
You all act like you don't know how much bandwidth can be saved with
17 matches
Mail list logo
