On 14/1/09 05:31, mary-anne.nay...@medicareaustralia.gov.au wrote:
They are using them to facilitate the menu/header/footer ite,s across a
host of applications which sit on a range of differing servers using a rang
of differing technologies. I suggested SSI's but that is not possible due
to serve
yes mark, we are a Government entity. Just so you know, I am talking about
approving the use of iframes NOT frames in a limited capacity due to
specific technical difficulties. The Government guidelines say that online
content should be accessible. From what I understand of WCAG2.0, It is
possib
mary-anne.nay...@medicareaustralia.gov.au wrote:
They are using them to facilitate the menu/header/footer ite,s across a
host of applications which sit on a range of differing servers using a rang
of differing technologies. I suggested SSI's but that is not possible due
to server configuration is
bstandard
sgroup.orgSubject
Re: [WSG] Frames/iFrames
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
13/01/2009 06:12
On 12/1/09 07:12, mary-anne.nay...@medicareaustralia.gov.au wrote:
I am just wondering what is the general consensus on the use of Frames or
iFrames these days. WCAG2.0 is not terribly clear on whether we should or
shouldn't be using them.
WCAG 2.0 tries to express the principles of web accessi
On 12/01/2009, at 6:12 PM, mary-anne.nay...@medicareaustralia.gov.au
wrote:
I am just wondering what is the general consensus on the use of
Frames or iFrames these days.
When required, I use HTML 4.01 transitional and iFrames to take
advantage of iFrame remoting. Combined with unobtrusive J
Hi,
I am just wondering what is the general consensus on the use of Frames or
iFrames these days. WCAG2.0 is not terribly clear on whether we should or
shouldn't be using them. I understand there are usability issues as well as
problems with Search Engines.
I have a client that seems determined
