On 04/07/07, Brian Cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Meta tags are all but depreciated at this point.
That's a bold - and largely incorrect - statement. Perhaps the META tags
that were covered in most Beginning HTML type books a few years ago aren't
needed any more (although
No all meta tags are depreciated, and i cant see them being either, google
still uses the meta=description , as also bruce has pointed out.
Regards
On 7/4/07, Bruce Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 19:04 -0400, Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Joyce Evans wrote:
Is it
James Jeffery wrote:
No all meta tags are depreciated, and i cant see them being either, google
still uses the meta=description , as also bruce has pointed out.
Not to pick on you, James, because Bruce already used it, but the word
is deprecated not depreciated.
And before someone picks on
Sorry, that was a type error, sometimes i wizz so fast on the keyboard i
miss keys
and hit extra keys, must be my fat fingers.
Depreciated means to lessen the value, and the value of meta tags has gone
down
hill from the days when they got abused to boost page rankings, but its not
going to be
Although meta tags are depreciated,
I was reading yesterday, you can still include meta information for specific
spiders, like only telling yahoo spiders to go away
On 7/4/07, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, that was a type error, sometimes i wizz so fast on the keyboard i
miss
Although meta tags are depreciated,
I was reading yesterday, you can still include meta information for
specific spiders, like only telling yahoo spiders to go away
I think Google and Yahoo also see rel=nofollow on links
(to prevent the link from being counted for a page's ranking - such as
Hi Mark
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 21:42 +1200, Mark Harris wrote:
James Jeffery wrote:
No all meta tags are depreciated, and i cant see them being either, google
still uses the meta=description , as also bruce has pointed out.
Not to pick on you, James, because Bruce already used it, but
I'm new to this group, so if this discussion has occurred in the past, I'm
not aware of it.
Is it important to include the following as part of the meta tags on web
pages?
meta name=robots content=index,follow
Joyce
***
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:45:26 -0500, Joyce Evans wrote:
Is it important to include the following as part of the meta tags on
web pages?
meta name=robots content=index,follow
No.
'index' and 'follow' are the default values for the robots meta - any
robot will assume these values if there is
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 19:04 -0400, Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Joyce Evans wrote:
Is it important to include the following as part of the meta tags on
web pages?
meta name=robots content=index,follow
No. Meta tags are all but depreciated at this point. he only common
one still being
10 matches
Mail list logo
