On 17 May 2008, at 06:03, David Hucklesby wrote:
For some reason, sizing nearly everything in pixels is viewed as
easy and efficient. I find I have to be super-careful when using
fixed pixel sizes for anything, given the many and varied ways that
this or that browser or operating system affects
.
--
From: tee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:00 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] possible to make absolute position moves down with fontsize
resize?
Lately I have coded many templates that clients wanted an element that
aligns
Lately I have coded many templates that clients wanted an element that
aligns horizontally and has it stayed at the bottom of a content
block. The only way I could think is using absolute position, but it
creates an overlapping problem with font size resize. I am curious if
there is a
Lately I have coded many templates that clients wanted an element
that aligns horizontally and has it stayed at the bottom of a
content block. The only way I could think is using absolute
position, but it creates an overlapping problem with font size
resize. I am curious if there is a
On May 16, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
While that will work quite nicely you could also avoid absolute
positioning altogether. Because those ordered lists are all nicely
lined up you could set the min-height rule on them instead
of .box_res and .box_biz eg.
add this:
On Fri, 16 May 2008 02:00:37 -0700, tee wrote:
Lately I have coded many templates that clients wanted an element that aligns
horizontally and has it stayed at the bottom of a content block. The only way
I could
think is using absolute position, but it creates an overlapping problem with
