Re: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Mark Stanton
Guys hate to rain on your parade but if your browser can understand that obfuscation what makes you think that a email address harvestor is not going to be able to? These guys are writing complex viruses that harvest email addresses directly from people's Outlook contact lists, surely they can

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Alan Harrison
I have been using the obfuscation method for some time now, and while it may not totally eliminate spam harvesting, IMHO it certainly does slow the harvesting down. I have used the javascript method also, with the addition of a gif displaying the e-mail address for folks that have javascript

Re: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 6/4/04 2:05 AM Mike Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: There is no doubting professional harvesters will easily circumvent the obfuscation. This is a damage limitation exercise. In this war of attrition, any counter-measure is better than none. A 'What's the point attitude' is

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Mike Pepper
--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan Harrison Sent: 04 June 2004 08:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion I have been using the obfuscation

Re: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Mark Harwood
It does now... why not use the content: selector and set your email in there ;) Shame IE dont like Content: tho! * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-04 Thread Lea de Groot
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:41:32 +1000, Alan Harrison wrote: Mark is quite correct when he says that complex e-mail harvesters will probably work around these methods, but it appears that most of the harvesting is done by very basic programs that are looking only for e-mail addresses stored in

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-03 Thread Mike Pepper
Jaime, Just use http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com/obfuscate_email.asp. Might prove useful and does it all for you, including complete mail-to strings. Mike Pepper Accessible Web Developer (with a headache because he's been on the system way too long) http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-03 Thread Jaime W
the default which is ISO Conversion. Best Wishes, Jaime ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pepper Sent: Friday, 4 June 2004 3:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-03 Thread Mike Pepper
) www.seowebsitepromotion.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jaime W Sent: 03 June 2004 22:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion Mike you are a gem! This tool generates codes that validates in XHTML 1.0 DTD

RE: [WSG] Anti-spam mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion

2004-06-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto encoders using Character Entity Evasion Mike you are a gem! This tool generates codes that validates in XHTML 1.0 DTD Strict! Is helpful and great for lazy people like me lol. Tested it and it works great. Thank you thank you very much! By the way what is the differences between ISO and Hex