Therefore I'm very curious as to what the general concensus is
from my fellow standards advocates when designing sites using liguid
layouts?
Truely liquid layouts will look fine at any resolution. Your
examples are not liquid layouts. Your first and last examples use
fixed widths, and the middle
Hi Kenny,
You're right, I made an assumption that because they stretched across the
entire viewport in
1024X768 then the authors used fluid layouts, which was a mistake on my part,
and next time I'll
be sure to check their CSS, but it still makes my ask why they ignored 800X600.
Anyway, thanks
challenged as well. These are all things
to consider.
Buddy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 2:16 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Screen
and also that no designer in the world that does graphic design is going
to have a 800x600 monitor resolution
I still can't get this implication between resolution (2560x1024 in my
case) and the size of viewport in browser (max. 900-1000px wide in my
case) - see
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:42:37 +0200, Jan Brasna wrote:
I still can't get this implication between resolution (2560x1024 in
my case) and the size of viewport in browser (max. 900-1000px wide in
my case) - see http://tmp.anum.biz/Image44.png (screenshot of my
desktop) - none of the browser
Lea de Groot said:
Honestly, it doesn't seem to matter how big the screen is. Jo(e) Public
surfs at 100%.
I don't like it, but its true.
For the number of years I've been building sites (over 6 years full time)
I'm struggling to remember ever seeing a client or user (as opposed to a
