RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread Kepler Gelotte
Hi Taco,

I would suggest using a percentage to size the text in the yellow band
instead of smaller since IE has a different idea of what smaller is
compared to Firefox:

p span.smaller {
font-size: 80%;
}

I would also suggest using em sizing. The height of the yellow band would
then resize along with the text:

#frm_s {
position: absolute;
top: 41px;
width: 100%;
height: 3em;
border-top: 1px solid #fff;
background-color: #fc0;
background: url(/_resource/image/mn_shadow.gif) #fc0 bottom
no-repeat;
}

Basically anything you want to resize when he font size is changed can be
sized using ems. At font-size: 100%, 1em = 16px. At font-size: 62.5%, 1em =
10px.

I would also suggest having the second row of divs (box1, box2, box3)
contained within the divs sellstuff, buystuff, mystuff and position them at
the bottom. 

Regards,
Kepler

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

 
Hi Felix thanks for the effort.

A solution to the problem would be great as well ;-) Min-height doesn't work
in all browsers which would be the best solution I guess.

Any ideas on why the purple background while it should be white, or is that
just your screenshot?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Felix Miata
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:22 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

[I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.]

On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur apparently typed:

 Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?

 http://web-strategists.com:888

I like it a lot above the yellow, but I don't like 3.5 word line lengths at
all. An unset background color and links half hiding behind other things are
unimpressive as well. http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/tacofl2.jpg
--
The path of the righteous is like the first gleam of dawn, shining
ever brighter till the full light of day.  Proverbs 4:18 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun

Taco Fleur wrote:

http://web-strategists.com:888


Could do with suitable 'min-width' and 'max-width'.

Not well prepared for regular 'minimum font size', or even for 'font
resizing' in IE/win.

Also, I get the off-screen text for the click here to start selling
in at the left side on really wide windows.

regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread Ben Dodson

http://web-strategists.com:888


You've got a transparent background-color set somewhere as all of the
white space on the sides of the content and under the footer is
currently browser default (mine is set to pink so I can see sites that
aren't defining background-colors!).  This prob isn't much of a
problem but everyone should be aware that people might have changed
their browser default and it'll make your site look bad.

Nice site though :-)

Ben
--
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: http://www.bendodson.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread kevin mcmonagle


http://web-strategists.com:888

Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png 
transparency for the floating logo.


http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp


-best
kvn



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread Taco Fleur
Thanks for your response, however,
 I wish I understood what you both meant by this, but I don't.
Min max width where/how?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kevin mcmonagle
Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 5:01 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread


http://web-strategists.com:888

Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png
transparency for the floating logo.

http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp


-best
kvn



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
 
Thanks.

How large did you size the font to? We've only anticipated 1 size up, as its
already a large font. You can't win in every situation ;-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Taco,

Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:

The yellow bar.  As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand with it.  The content instead eventually hides as it passes the
bottom of the bar.  If the yellow bar and the drop shadow below it are one
image, I would simply separate them and make the drop shadow a top-place
background image below the yellow bar so the bar itself can expand without
breaking said shadow.

That sounds confusing - heres a screenshot in WinXP/IE6.  Firefox 2 does the
same thing FYI:

http://sitesbyjoe.com/files/wsg/sell-my-stuff.gif

*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design  Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



Taco Fleur wrote:
 For some reason my other emails ended up in someone else's thread, 
 even though I created a new message from scratch.

 Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?

 http://web-strategists.com:888

 Thanks in advance...

 Taco Fleur
 www.pacificfox.com.au website design





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



   


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
 
May I add that your suggestion would work.

However we'd have to deal with other issues like the new white space (bottom
of yellow to white gradient) that would appear from the font-increase etc.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Taco,

Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:

The yellow bar.  As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand with it.  The content instead eventually hides as it passes the
bottom of the bar.  If the yellow bar and the drop shadow below it are one
image, I would simply separate them and make the drop shadow a top-place
background image below the yellow bar so the bar itself can expand without
breaking said shadow.

That sounds confusing - heres a screenshot in WinXP/IE6.  Firefox 2 does the
same thing FYI:

http://sitesbyjoe.com/files/wsg/sell-my-stuff.gif

*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design  Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



Taco Fleur wrote:
 For some reason my other emails ended up in someone else's thread, 
 even though I created a new message from scratch.

 Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?

 http://web-strategists.com:888

 Thanks in advance...

 Taco Fleur
 www.pacificfox.com.au website design





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



   


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Felix Miata
[I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.]

On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur apparently typed:

 Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?

 http://web-strategists.com:888

I like it a lot above the yellow, but I don't like 3.5 word line lengths at
all. An unset background color and links half hiding behind other things are
unimpressive as well. http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/tacofl2.jpg
-- 
The path of the righteous is like the first gleam of dawn, shining
ever brighter till the full light of day.  Proverbs 4:18 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Joseph R. B. Taylor

Taco,

Don't worry, I'm not one of these nuts who blows up the text to 1200% or 
anything.  I make my largest benchmark the largest setting on IE which 
is the about the equivalent to 2 sizes up on Firefox.


No, its not the end of the world by any means, but you know what happens 
when you ask for a site check around here.


*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design  Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



Taco Fleur wrote:
 
Thanks.


How large did you size the font to? We've only anticipated 1 size up, as its
already a large font. You can't win in every situation ;-)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Taco,

Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:

The yellow bar.  As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand with it.  The content instead eventually hides as it passes the
bottom of the bar.  If the yellow bar and the drop shadow below it are one
image, I would simply separate them and make the drop shadow a top-place
background image below the yellow bar so the bar itself can expand without
breaking said shadow.

That sounds confusing - heres a screenshot in WinXP/IE6.  Firefox 2 does the
same thing FYI:

http://sitesbyjoe.com/files/wsg/sell-my-stuff.gif

*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design  Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



Taco Fleur wrote:
  
For some reason my other emails ended up in someone else's thread, 
even though I created a new message from scratch.


Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?

http://web-strategists.com:888

Thanks in advance...

Taco Fleur
www.pacificfox.com.au website design





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



  




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



  



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-15 Thread Taco Fleur
No, its perfectly fine, its exactly what I was asking for.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 3:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

Taco,

Don't worry, I'm not one of these nuts who blows up the text to 1200% or
anything.  I make my largest benchmark the largest setting on IE which is
the about the equivalent to 2 sizes up on Firefox.

No, its not the end of the world by any means, but you know what happens
when you ask for a site check around here.

*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design  Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



Taco Fleur wrote:
  
 Thanks.

 How large did you size the font to? We've only anticipated 1 size up, 
 as its already a large font. You can't win in every situation ;-)

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
 Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

 Taco,

 Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:

 The yellow bar.  As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does 
 not expand with it.  The content instead eventually hides as it passes 
 the bottom of the bar.  If the yellow bar and the drop shadow below it 
 are one image, I would simply separate them and make the drop shadow a 
 top-place background image below the yellow bar so the bar itself can 
 expand without breaking said shadow.

 That sounds confusing - heres a screenshot in WinXP/IE6.  Firefox 2 
 does the same thing FYI:

 http://sitesbyjoe.com/files/wsg/sell-my-stuff.gif

 *Joseph R. B. Taylor*
 Sites by Joe, LLC
 /Custom Web Design  Development/
 Phone: (609) 335-3076
 www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com



 Taco Fleur wrote:
   
 For some reason my other emails ended up in someone else's thread, 
 even though I created a new message from scratch.

 Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?

 http://web-strategists.com:888

 Thanks in advance...

 Taco Fleur
 www.pacificfox.com.au website design





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



   
 


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***







 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***



   


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***