RE: [WSG] XHTML: 1.0 transitional-1.0 strict-1.1

2004-03-21 Thread Jason Turnbull
Neerav wrote: So now im comfortable using XHTML 1.0 transitional how hard would moving to 1.0 strict and then onto 1.1 be? The move from transitional to strict you wont find hard. This list of tags shows what is and isn't allowed in XHTML 1.0 strict, I do not know of any browser quirks

RE: [WSG] XHTML: 1.0 transitional-1.0 strict-1.1

2004-03-21 Thread Peter Firminger
The quick test is to simply change the doctype and hit a validator to see what issues arise from your code and then work through them. Remember though that if you're changing from XHTML 1.0 Transitional, then you really need to change the way the document is sent to the browser, the mime type

Re: [WSG] XHTML: 1.0 transitional-1.0 strict-1.1

2004-03-21 Thread Chris Stratford
One thing i just noticed about W3Schools... http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_a.asp It states: Differences Between HTML and XHTML NONE but as we all know - XHTML doesnt allow the TARGET attribute... Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Http://www.neester.com Peter Firminger wrote: The

Re: [WSG] XHTML: 1.0 transitional-1.0 strict-1.1

2004-03-21 Thread Anne van Kesteren (fora)
Chris Stratford wrote: but as we all know - XHTML doesnt allow the TARGET attribute... Neither does HTML 4.01 Strict. However, there are many differences between XHTML and HTML [1]. [1] http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: [WSG] XHTML: 1.0 transitional-1.0 strict-1.1

2004-03-21 Thread Ben Bishop
Chris Stratford wrote: but as we all know - XHTML doesnt allow the TARGET attribute... Let's not perpetuate misinformation here. You _can_ use the TARGET attribute in XHTML. Check the replies to your 8/2/04 post titled XHTML (OT??) You'll find good information in the W3C's XHTML Abstract