Re: [WSG] Review Accessability Of My Site

2008-04-08 Thread Jon Gunderson
Here is a tool that can help identify functional accessibility issues: http://fae.cita.uiuc.edu Jon On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Marvin Hunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Check out my home page at http://startrekcafe.stevesdomain.net/ Check out my Jaws Australia Group at

RE: [WSG] Review Accessability Of My Site

2008-04-07 Thread Elizabeth Spiegel
Hi Marvin Just a quick check: - With images off, the contrast between text and background is very low. - Text on a patterned background is relatively difficult to read - not specifically for blind/vision-impaired. - In IE6, large text overlaps - line height is insufficient as you have set the

Re: [WSG] Review Accessability Of My Site

2008-04-06 Thread dwain
On 4/6/08, Marvin Hunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. could some one take a look at my site and give me feedback, if you can read the text, blind and vision impaired users, if they can read the text, etc. and what other accessability features, i may need to put in, or general comments or

Re: [WSG] review

2005-03-20 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
Nice website. First thing, the hover under the links. It is bad under the images. I am using Firefox on Win XP. It does not work well and i don't know if that is how you want it... You might want to set it for the images also on your CSS file. Everything else seems alright. But are you sure that

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-21 Thread Terrence Wood
380k+ flash animation on the home page is just obnoxious... but following that up with 220k+ on the next page... I'm lost for words. Terrence Wood. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-21 Thread Karl Brightman
Hey Miles, Wow, i live in WA but never heard of you guys, good to see a company in WA that likes standards :) Im not so sure about the flash like others have said on this site, big size to load and not so sure about the animating bomb sparks, started to annoy me after a lil while. The rest

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-21 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 1/21/05 1:22 AM Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: 380k+ flash animation on the home page is just obnoxious... but following that up with 220k+ on the next page... I'm lost for words. Terrence Wood. In the Americas somewhere on broadband, I can't even get the page to load,

RE: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-21 Thread Inge Forlenza
Your site has general accessibility issues, that probably need to be corrected if your firm wants to be considered 'a good corporate citizens' when providing access to web sites to people with disabilities. Running your site through a speech reader makes your site very annoying, some simple

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-20 Thread The Bo$$
The transitions were kinda dizzying but otherwise it looks very nice. :) Nine thumbs up! On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:47:40 -0800, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The header, if it were a transition between screens it would be engaging. As a header element it loses it punch sitting at

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-20 Thread Carmelyne Thompson
The bomb animation gets me so distracted. I felt like a seizure was being summoned. :) It was running in a circular pattern so there was the hypnotic feel for it too. The CSS does not validate: URI : http://www.bam.com.au/common/bamcreative.css Line: 83 Context : #navlist a:hover a:active

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

2005-01-20 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Miles Burke wrote: We've just launched our new website, having had a quick CSS learning curve over the last few months, and would love opinions/feedback/criticism of it. Everything is game - let me know it all, no matter how bad. :) Please have a gander at http://www.bam.com.au The page looked