[wsjt-devel] RIg list sort order patch

2018-05-09 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Sort rig list in case insensitive order. https://www.dropbox.com/s/qlfi294ydbm4r4n/riglist.patch?dl=1 Currently the rig list is in case sensitive order which is not human friendly.  e.g. Items like DX show up before Do. de Mike W9MDB ---

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
The problem has already been taken care of by Joe.Fox can no longer transmit on standard frequencies. de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, May 9, 2018, 5:21:23 PM CDT, g...@isect.com wrote: Here's something a little different. How about inviting stations to "vote" on whether a given DX stat

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread gary
Here's something a little different. How about inviting stations to "vote" on whether a given DX station should change to DXpedition mode? I have in mind a new message format, or free text string, that they can send. At the DX end, activating DXpedition mode is dependent on having received, say,

Re: [wsjt-devel] can't decode an interval after an interrupted TX

2018-05-09 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
I believe that was fixed in r8646 de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, May 9, 2018, 4:28:26 PM CDT, Jeff Pyle wrote: Hello, If a transmissions starts on an interval, and I immediately interrupt it, (what's left of) that interval does not decode.  If I click the decode button, I get the foll

[wsjt-devel] can't decode an interval after an interrupted TX

2018-05-09 Thread Jeff Pyle
Hello, If a transmissions starts on an interval, and I immediately interrupt it, (what's left of) that interval does not decode. If I click the decode button, I get the following error: Running: /usr/bin/jt9 -s WSJT-X -w 1 -m 3 -e /usr/bin -a > /home/jpyle/.local/share/WSJT-X -t /tmp/WSJT-X > At

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Wolfgang
Hello Alex, MSHV has such a mode. Unfortunately it is also capable to TX with multi carriers - and this is creating the same chaos as Fox & Hound does right now. I was a semi-rare DX stations with up to 12 callers at the same time. An 'Multi Answering Auto Seq Protocoll' with one carrier, will spe

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Alex, VE3NEA
On 2018-05-09 10:40, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074. Everybody though he was calling simple CQ but was Fox so wasn't hearing them and users were crowding the lower e

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Ryan Tourge
If you could force my FT-857D to comply with CAT control I would be all for it HIHI On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Yup...sure ishopefully that will stop 99% of them (except the ones who > manually dial in the rig). > E

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Yup...sure ishopefully that will stop 99% of them (except the ones who manually dial in the rig).Ensuring they have CAT control would help with that but not sure we want to enforce CAT control, do we? de Mike W9MDB On Wednesday, May 9, 2018, 10:49:48 AM CDT, Jay Hainline wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Bobby Chandler
Mike, I believe Joe has a routine in a later build that inhibits FOX from using standard frequencies. It won't work, however, until the 'FOX' builds it or they download the GA release when it is available. Bobby/N4AU bob...@bellsouth.net n...@arrl.net -

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Jay Hainline
Isnt this addressed in r8647? Jay KA9CFD Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone Original message From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel Date: 5/9/18 09:40 (GMT-06:00) To: WSJT Software Development Cc: Black Michael Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible? There appar

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Brian Dickman
Another "active solution": auto-disengage Fox mode if many decodes are standard CQs. It's a good indicator that you are sitting on the standard channel and shouldn't be allowed to call Fox. -- Brian AF7MD On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: > There apparently was

[wsjt-devel] The Real Question.

2018-05-09 Thread Steve Sacco NN4X
Greetings, all.  Thank you,  WSJT development team for your amazing work.  I was on 6M last evening, working E's across the U.S., and was really appreciating how in just one year, FT8 has taken over the band, and essentially displaced both SSB and CW for D

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread jarmo
Wed, 9 May 2018 14:40:40 + (UTC) Black Michael via wsjt-devel kirjoitti: > There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from > a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074.  Everybody S01WS every day, and running n5. Quite annoying... Jarmo

[wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

2018-05-09 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074.  Everybody though he was calling simple CQ but was Fox so wasn't hearing them and users were crowding the lower end of 20M trying to get him making even the the Fox/Hound