Bravo!
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:02:35 -0400
James Shaver wrote:
> No CAT control with this old rig (picture attached) and it holds its own ;)
>
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
Bill,
Thanks for your reply and suggestion about using the Qt Accessibility
interface. Sam, W2JDB, who has been working on the QLog (QuickLog) program
says that he will get up to speed on its use. He released QLog Version 157
today for testing by our 5 visually impaired QLog beta testers.
I'm lo
No CAT control with this old rig (picture attached) and it holds its own ;)
> On Apr 25, 2019, at 5:07 PM, Jim Shorney wrote:
>
>
> The point was that CAT is not essential in any case. The notion that CAT is
> *required* to use FT/JT modes is a myth propagated by those who don't know
> any
The point was that CAT is not essential in any case. The notion that CAT is
*required* to use FT/JT modes is a myth propagated by those who don't know any
better. There are those of us who do not use CAT for whatever reason and we
appreciate the ability to operate this way. To successfully to
Thanks Bill
I was not sure of the answer - so great, if the format is supported currently
in FT8 it will be in FT4 - good.
I see the EU VHF contest mode is getting a little more use now - mainly the
Nordic 50 Mhz contest.
Regards
Tom
--
73’s
Tom
GM8MJV (IO85)
On 25 Apr 2019, at 19:24, D
On 23/04/2019 16:40, Tom Melvin wrote:
I don’t want to assume so will ask - FT4 aimed at ‘Contest Friendly digital
modes’ - cool - BUT will it cater for the pile of weird contest rules that are
out there. The abundance of requests for QSO Parties, Field Days where
non-standards messages. Heck
Hi Tom, GM8MJV.
My thoughts exactly.
However of course it's not just UK contesting it's the EU and most of
Region 1 where 6 character locators are needed to be exchanged.
73's all
Dave, M0HJS.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 16:43, Tom Melvin wrote:
>
>
> Hi All
>
> I don’t want to assume so will as
Bill,
Thanks for the info. I'm an old CW op at heart, and even with a PhD in EE,
I sometimes scratch my head trying to figure out why the software works the
way it does.
73,
Frank
KF6E
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:54 AM Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 25/04/2019 14:15, Frank Kirschner wrote:
> > Some
On 25/04/2019 14:15, Frank Kirschner wrote:
Someone wrote that the software prevented using Hound mode in the
regular band segments. I was just demonstrating that this was not the
case. I didn't actually transmit, since I saw no stations in Fox mode.
Frank,
WSJT-X tries to prevent *Fox* FT8
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:49 PM Jim Shorney wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:11:19 +0100
> "Martin Davies G0HDB" wrote:
>
> > The use of Split is all-but essential for slick operation in Hound mode,
> which is presumably
> > why the software complained if you changed to a Hound configuration
> w
Martin,
Thanks for you complete reply. I appreciate your taking the time. My
comments are below.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:20 AM Martin Davies G0HDB
wrote:
>
> Frank:
>
> If the station you want to work is concurrently transmitting multiple
> (typically 3) signals 60Hz
> apart, and conducting m
11 matches
Mail list logo
