On 17/08/2019 23:34, Paul Bramscher wrote:
I noticed this warning message regarding policy settings for CMake.
Debian 10 is using cmake version 3.13.4.
Ultimately I ignored the message and it seems to have compiled perfectly
fine, but possibly the WSJT-X developers may keep an eye out on the
add
I've finally upgraded my last Linux PC to Debian 10, the most complex in
my shack (compiled executables for fldigi, flrig, TQSL, and of course
WSJT-X among several other apps and stacks).
Overall the process went smoothly, since I've heavily documented what
I've done previously.
Apologies if this
Hi Andy,
Plese try to make QSOs using MSHV! (I am just using the latest version
V2.25)
You will learn a lesson about how easy to make "automatic" QSOs -say in FT4!
Just try it and do not follow April fools!
gl de ha6nn
Andy
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 5:27 PM Andy Durbin wrote:
> "This is illegal so
Jim,
Under FCC rules, automatic control means not having a control operator
present at a control point. This applies to all of the sections you
specified. If I want to sit in front of my computer (the control point)
and read my e-mail, the newspaper or watch TV while my program is doing
the a
There is a difference. They don’t auto CQ and full auto are in restricted
sub-bands.
Ria
N2RJ
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:02 PM Ryan Tourge wrote:
> It’s short sighted attempts to blat. Packet, APRS, the Winlink modes, all
> auto sequence after a connection is initiated. There really is no
> diff
You might want to have a close look at 97.221(b) and (c).
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:57:31 -0400
Ryan Tourge wrote:
> It’s short sighted attempts to blat. Packet, APRS, the Winlink modes, all
> auto sequence after a connection is initiated. There really is no
> difference.
>
> On Sa
97.3(6) Automatic control. The use of devices and procedures for control of a
station when it is transmitting so that compliance with the FCC Rules is
achieved without the control operator being present at a control point.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:54:19 -0700
David Gilbert wrote:
It’s short sighted attempts to blat. Packet, APRS, the Winlink modes, all
auto sequence after a connection is initiated. There really is no
difference.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:53 PM Jim Shorney wrote:
>
> Rules pertaining to Automatic Operation can be found in Part 97 sections:
>
> 97.3(6)
> 9
It’s not illegal to have fully automated stations but current fcc
regulations have stipulations which are detailed in 97.221.
Technically a ft8 auto responding station would be covered under 97.221(c)
- it is responding to interrogation under local or remote control, and less
than 500Hz.
However,
The guy who made that claim didn't know what he was talking about.
Automatic is not the same thing as unattended.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 8/17/2019 10:07 AM, Andy Durbin wrote:
"This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere, and should
not be used, even with the added line "always at
Rules pertaining to Automatic Operation can be found in Part 97 sections:
97.3(6)
97.221
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:07:20 +
Andy Durbin wrote:
> "This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere, and should
> not be used, even with the added line "always attend to your
"This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere, and should
not be used, even with the added line "always attend to your transceive
when using" this does not make it legal."
What specific FCC regulations permit a single QSO to be auto sequenced but
prohibit auto sequencing of 2 or more
Hello Neil,
Saturday, August 17, 2019, 4:07:45 PM, you wrote:
> This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere
please stay cool and with the facts! No, the software is not 'illegal'!
Just using the unattended & automatic operation without presence of
an operator is (or maybe) not all
UM ... what's that 'Auto CQ' checkbox there ?? Looks like its setup
for an automatic QSO machine? Looking at the intro on Sourceforge ..
"Tool was previously known as WSJT-X SQ9FVE Full-Auto Mod"
This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere, and should
not be used, even with the
FWIW if you're using JT-Alert, it has a decodes history window that
gives you everything you're looking for, and more.
I'd want to see what the layout looks on other modes before I would use
this. As someone who used to design screen layouts, this is somewhat
busy, how does it work when y
I have seen the top screen with everything turned on, and there is so
little space to ADD anything else to it. Each spot is used by one mode or
another, but of course, not all at the same time, so it looks like wasted
space. Agreed, the time box and others could be reduced somewhat to give a
few
16 matches
Mail list logo
