Re: [wsjt-devel] 2 wishes for the next version: retain Operator; clear old Rpt

2020-05-17 Thread Jim Shorney
F2 > Reporting > Op Call 73 -Jim NU0C On Mon, 18 May 2020 00:34:22 +0200 Andreas Heertsch wrote: > - Is it possible to *retain *the *Operator* too in the *Log QSO *window? ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[wsjt-devel] 2 wishes for the next version: retain Operator; clear old Rpt

2020-05-17 Thread Andreas Heertsch
2 wishes for the next version - Is it possible to *retain *the *Operator* too in the *Log QSO *window? - It would be fine, if *Rpt Sent* and* Rpt Rcvd *in the *Log QSO *window of the previous QSO would be cleared after logging. Now the old values are retained until new values are

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1 - Waterfall Palette

2020-05-17 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi Jim and Ari, Ari is correct, the only button on the Fast Graph window is the "Adjust" one which automatically becomes the default button; that in turn responds to the ENTER key. I have removed that automatic default for the next release, which should make it less likely to accidentally

Re: [wsjt-devel] Suggestion re OpenSSL

2020-05-17 Thread Bill Somerville
Steve, that's not possible, the OpenSSL libraries are controlled by US state and federal export restrictions on strong cryptography. The end user must obtain them themselves and take note if the restrictions apply to them. We do not, nor wish to, restrict the ability of international Amateur

[wsjt-devel] Suggestion re OpenSSL

2020-05-17 Thread Stephen VK3SIR
Hi Gents, As a suggestion is it possible to direct the installer scripts on a Windows build to auto-deploy the Appropriate Win32 or Win64 OpenSSL Lite package? Should the SDK's and package requirements be looked at with regards to providing access to these libraries available for the future?

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1 - Waterfall Palette

2020-05-17 Thread Ari Paananen
Hi Jim, I've noticed the same thing and it happens when the focus is in the WSJT-X waterfall window and you press enter twice while thinking the focus is in some other window. 73 de Ari OH2ECG On 17.5.2020 22:14, Jim Brown wrote: > I use the ZL1FZ palette. Running FT8, the setting

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1 - Waterfall Palette

2020-05-17 Thread Jim Brown
I use the ZL1FZ palette. Running FT8, the setting occasionally changes to User Defined with no "trigger" that I've been able to identify as the cause. I know it's happened because the traces change to white from the multi-color ZL1FZ palette. This has happened several times in the 6 days I've

[wsjt-devel] Call 1st unchecked ignored

2020-05-17 Thread WB5JJJ
After unchecking Call 1st, it's sometimes still active for the first couple of CQ calls and populates everything and responds to an unwanted CQ. Eventually, it does as requested, but then after a slot change, it again answers even though unchecked. -- George - WB5JJJ 4

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread Adrian
Bill, Sorry I did not make it clear, here is a video ; https://youtu.be/_WicmOfsY6A The rapid relay oscillation due to incorrect mode is what first alerted me to the issue. Regards Adrian From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Sunday, 17 May 2020 11:30 PM

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 75, Issue 80

2020-05-17 Thread Al Pawlowski
Don’t know if will help, but running some checks on my setup (an ANAN SDR, running Thetis and using HamLib TS2000, with CAT PTT) gave me the following. If WSJTx mode is set to Data/Pkt, my radio will not work correctly when set to data mode. Clicking WSJTx tune sometimes triggers PTT, usually

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread Adrian
Bill, Sorry I did not make it clear, here is a video ; https://youtu.be/_WicmOfsY6A The rapid relay oscillation due to incorrect mode is what first alerted me to the issue. Regards Adrian From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi Adrian, I am not certain you answered my second question. Does the Sub VFO mode get set when you transmit, i.e. if you have Sub on LSB and start WSJT-X then press the "Tune" button, does the Sub VFO change to Data-U just before the transmission starts? 73 Bill G4WJS. On 17/05/2020

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread Adrian
Hi Bill, and thank you for your work with the team on the new updates. Yes I do/did re > "Settings->Radio->Mode->Data/PKT" The frequency on the TX vfo (SUB) is set by wsjtx, and SUB set for TX is occurs when the scope TX marker is set 500KHz or more from the green RX marker either way. However

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread Adrian
Ken, OK, I tried 2.2.0rc1 for a couple of weeks, noted the bugs, and now have returned to 2.1.2 where I have the issue. Waiting until new release, until I again update Thankyou Adrian Fewster vk4tux On 17/5/20 6:13 pm, g0orh--- via wsjt-devel wrote: I have the 101MP. My sub goes intp TX

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread g0orh--- via wsjt-devel
I have the 101MP.My sub goes intp TX mode, main vfo RX. freq changes dependant on where in the band you are. Im running with RIG &  DATA/PKT Checked... faultless.With 2.2.0 with RADIO had to set with FT5000 rig to get the function working properly. FTdx101D failed here!!! Ken..G0ORH On

Re: [wsjt-devel] FTDX101MP split sub mode

2020-05-17 Thread Bill Somerville
On 17/05/2020 04:23, Adrian wrote: When selecting ‘RIG; for split under FTDX101MP radio choice with Data/pkt mode, the SUB is not cat set for DATA-U, under cat control as expected as the MAIN is. It has to be done manually selecting SUB and set on radio. If this could be added in next