Re: [wsjt-devel] FW: 2.2.2 Decoding Performance

2020-07-03 Thread Reino Talarmo
> [ I'll resend this as its not flowed through (Which has resulted in some testing of late) ] Steve, The first one arrived sound and safe at 7.44 local time here in the northern hemisphere. 73, Reino OH3mA ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.s

[wsjt-devel] FW: 2.2.2 Decoding Performance

2020-07-03 Thread Stephen VK3SIR
[ I'll resend this as its not flowed through (Which has resulted in some testing of late) ] Jim, A very appropriate comment based on some email chats here going on in the background. Background discussion that I have been having relates around the "standards" discussion opened earlier in the

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.2.2 Decoding Performance

2020-07-03 Thread Stephen VK3SIR
Jim, A very appropriate comment based on some email chats here going on in the background. Background discussion that I have been having relates around the "standards" discussion opened earlier in the week and the necessity in this modern day and age for standards with so many new manufacturer

[wsjt-devel] 2.2.2 Decoding Performance

2020-07-03 Thread Jim Brown
Several members of the Slack VHF group have commented that JTDX is decoding more signals than 2.2.2. Seeing that, I've started running both programs in parallel. Since I use VOX, that's easy to do. What I'm seeing is similar to my experience simultaneously running MMTTY and 2TONE for RTTY cont