Jim, A very appropriate comment based on some email chats here going on in the background. Background discussion that I have been having relates around the "standards" discussion opened earlier in the week and the necessity in this modern day and age for standards with so many new manufacturers - especially from China - coming online.
The point is that JTDX is a fork ... WSJTX is "The Model". WSJT-X being open source provides the base from where other things can evolve and possibly improve (i.e JTDX, JS8CALL just to name a couple of the main "forked" and in some cases evolved products). JTDX may very well have processing improvements. That is good, and can provide some utility for many users. Some MAY prefer its application - and that is well, good and highly constructive for AR. WSJTX is the model and sets base standards. Some "enhancements" in forks MAY at some stages may make it into the model too as it has (i.e. the RR73 from JTDX) ! And that is a good, constructive thing ! 73 Steve I VK3VM / VK3SIR Ps: I still use 2.2.1 in this "antipodean" location as it does clearly provide some advantages, from my experience in my location, over 2.2.2 ! _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
