Hi Andy,
It would be nice if the software would allow the operator determine if the 73
message should always be part of the automatic exchange. In almost any other
mode you can make that choice.
A few folks called me a few times during the 2m and 222 sprints even though I
thought we already
Yes double click TX4 to alternate RRR/RR73 . Hover mouse pointer over
TX4 to get popup directions.
vk4tux
On 4/10/21 12:37 pm, Marco Calistri wrote:
For me RRR is optional, if I remember correctly I need to double click
some specific button, it is indicated by hovering the mouse on the
For me RRR is optional, if I remember correctly I need to double click some
specific button, it is indicated by hovering the mouse on the right one.
So far at the end of the qso my WSJTX sends RR73, I didn't understand how it
could default to RRR for somebody.
73's PY1ZRJ
Scarica Outlook per
If you really want to send a 73, you can, you select the call , enable
TX and select TX5.
Manual sends like this are doable, after the auto sequencing has finished.
vk4tux
On 4/10/21 12:08 pm, Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel wrote:
Thanks to all who responded to my question.
I suspected
Thanks to all who responded to my question.
I suspected that this would be the answer. I've found that often a station not
receiving the 73 from me in return, then sends 73 again sometimes until I
respond in kind with a 73. And I generally don't use RR73.
It's not a bug and by design.
The S9OK DXpedition ops guide specifically states "Once you decode the message
‘ S9OK ... RR73' (also called the TX4 message) from us, you should
log the QSO."
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 19:33:27 -0400
Gene Marsh via wsjt-devel wrote:
> Allen and Andy,
>
> Yes, it is not required.
Allen and Andy,
Yes, it is not required. However, many stations (especially fox and hound)
MUST receive a 73 to acknowledge a contact for a card.
73 de W8NET Miles “Gene” Marsh
> On Oct 3, 2021, at 7:20 PM, Allan Downie via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy...Yes it happens all the
Use RR73 instead of RRR and there is no issue, with one side saying RR
with 73, and the other then 73.
It is all there, I do not see the issue.
vk4tux
On 4/10/21 9:17 am, Allan Downie via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Andy...Yes it happens all the time..BY DESIGN, apparently. I find
it most
Hi Andy...Yes it happens all the time..BY DESIGN, apparently. I find it
most frustrating and bordering on rude. Technically the return 73 is not
required for a valid QSO, however it is the polite thing to do. At the
very least if confirms to your operating partner that all was received.
I
I need to go back and read the posts about this but right now I'm doing
this as a "me too" post.
Fedora 34 with WSJT-X 2.5.0, built in my COPR as the WSJT-X maintainer for
Fedora.
I get no RF output and have triple checked my settings. Fldigi and
pat/ardop (winlink client) work fine.
Thanks,
Hi Steve,
Thanks, I missed the syntax. The command line help says those are the
default values for -f and -F, so I thought I didn't need to supply them.
I really appreciate the capability to process a list of wav files. That
minimizes wav file space usage when WD decodes multiple FST4W modes
11 matches
Mail list logo
