I experienced this several times, though when I went back and looked at what
they sent in the decode window it appeared the other station was sending a
“normal” exchange not a “field day” exchange, so it would be something like
“-15” instead of the class/section.
Too bad it wasn’t able to so
Just wanted to add I was experiencing random crashing on Linux too, I don't
know if WSJT-X has any logs that would be helpful, all I got when I ran in a
terminal was 'SEGMENTATION FAULT' and it died.
It wasn't especially often for me, but was sufficiently annoying I ended up
writing a while(tru
For ARRL Field Day 2019, I recall there was a different set of frequencies used
for FT8.
Does anyone know if there will be a de-facto set of frequencies to use for
Field Day 2020 for FT8, and also for FT4? Or the default ones?
I did a Google search but I didn’t come up with anything rece
Not sure if this email will get thru or not...just noticed when I replied to a
message in this board I got an odd email...is this something that changed? Are
my messages being blocked?
My first reaction is this looks really suspicious, but I don't want to just
delete it and find out I get bann
Indeed - and people who want to do something will find a way, whether or not
its "legal" is irrelevant to people who will do it anyway.
So the best thing is make a good product for the people who want to use it for
fun and learning and quit worrying about everyone else.
-Matt / KK4NDE
Sent fro
Are you sure its when you hit OK and not the next 7.5 sec interval with the
other station still sending 73?
I have frequently had problems where the Enable button is shut iff repeatedly
because the station I just worked keeps sending the 73 message over and over
and every time it disables my TX
Beware those GPS receivers – I got one (unstable latency was throwing me off by
as much as 550mS on NTP) and I found that when I tried to set up ntpd to use
GPS it was showing jitter of around 0.8 seconds.
Further research, USB GPS is a BAD IDEA because there is often buffering in the
serial-US
That does seem like it could be useful, I would imagine the problem is
compounded by field day people in parks probably sync their clock before
leaving and that's it.
I do find it interesting sync thru my 4G connection in this park NTP estimates
less delay and jitter than on my normal cable ISP
de Mike W9MDB
[Inline image]
On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 06:42:25 AM CDT, Matthew Miller
mailto:mmill...@mail.umw.edu>> wrote:
IS there any documentation what an acceptable error is for FT4, FT8, etc?
As I was checking things over troubleshooting why things seem less reliable
toni
IS there any documentation what an acceptable error is for FT4, FT8, etc?
As I was checking things over troubleshooting why things seem less reliable
tonight I notice that my laptop instead of being within 100mS or so I see
`ntpstat` is reporting synchronized within 1.4 seconds syncing to
time.
Interesting, that's another different data-point for frequencies to use (I'm
not familiar with that groups.io but I think that site is where I had seen talk
of checking "the standard frequencies").
And just today there was a big fuss on the repeater a number of guys saying how
"digital especial
Was there any more recent info on frequencies for field day?
When I did some google-searches this evening I didn't find anything other than
a couple old posts where people in random forums said they planned to check the
usual frequenciesI'd like to try and figure out a plan by this weekend s
I would be interested in knowing as well, I haven’t figured out that button
either. I observed the same thing…with EnableTX it would call CQ and without
it the thing just sits forever.
-Matt / KK4NDE
From: David Kaplan via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, J
Why not just use the normal expected FT8 frequencies for FT8?
-Matt/KK4NDE
From: Tim Goeppinger via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 2:17 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Tim Goeppinger
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Proposed FT8 Frequencies for
Seems like the best way then would be if they maintain their own channel, as is
the case with CHIRP, VirtualBox, and countless other applications. Then I
could add that source and the package manager would use the more up to date
packages seamlessly. The packages are already being built for a
intervention to keep things working can and will fail sooner
or later.
-Matt / KK4NDE
From: Matthew Miller [mailto:mmill...@mail.umw.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 7:20 AM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Cc: 'Gustafson Neil'
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Expiration Date on Softwa
. Some users hung on to
them either deliberately or unintentionally.
73
Ria
N2RJ
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:52 PM Matthew Miller
mailto:mmill...@mail.umw.edu>> wrote:
I would recommend against it -- how would you pick a reasonable date to ensure
you don't need it to be updated sooner, a
I would recommend against it -- how would you pick a reasonable date to ensure
you don't need it to be updated sooner, and also not too soon that people have
to reinstall just to update the date?
A more reasonable approach would be to have it poll a file on the server that
tells the software wh
Sorry for the late report - I did get to participate but then I had to get food
and go to bed immediately after it ended so I didn't get to write up anything.
I managed 29 contacts in the 1 hour period including one duplicate.
I initially tried to use S&P mode but I still haven't been able to w
For a fair portion of tonight "something" (I'm not proficient at reading code)
was obliterating most of my FT4 spectrum really hot signal. Later I found what
I think was W1AW bulletins (had to try and decode with fldigi) in it. Monday I
swear I was hearing voices between the timeslots.
That s
I just experienced this behavior playing around tonight, I noticed I got stuck
in message 2 during a qso and when I hit "Halt TX" it switched off my
transmitter but did not clear EnableTX button. Then a few moments later my
transmitter keyed as it began the next scheduled TX cycle.
I just trie
If automation is the issue…as long as there is a human readable text label on
the buttons you could still automate it by taking some screenshots of the
bottom of the window and running it thru a OCR routine to find what the screen
position of the letters “OK” appear. If the remark really is tru
: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 6:57 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible bug in WSJTX 2.1.0-RC5 Log-Qso
On 30/04/2019 03:46, Matthew Miller wrote:
I have reasonably good vision and it trips me up, it seems like an
accessibility nightmare for anyone with less than perfect
-devel] Possible bug in WSJTX 2.1.0-RC5 Log-Qso
On 30/04/2019 02:39, Matthew Miller wrote:
I’ve been attempting to test the FT4 mode out tonight and I think I got it
working but I think there’s a bug in the logging window, it seems the OK and
Cancel buttons randomly change positions. I didn’t
I’ve been attempting to test the FT4 mode out tonight and I think I got it
working but I think there’s a bug in the logging window, it seems the OK and
Cancel buttons randomly change positions. I didn’t really notice until several
QSOs in and about the time my finger was releasing the mouse bu
25 matches
Mail list logo
