George,
I sometimes used macros like XX0YY PSE QSY and the like just for fast
firefighting..
That is not enough to solve the IARU Bandplan problem.
Our representatives at all the three IARU Regions meet regularly and above
all they communicate on their channels.
These communications are much
Bill Somerville kirjoitti 14.03.2018 klo 14:12:
On 14/03/2018 10:24, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.
Hi Jim,
why not?
I totally agree with Bill.
Why this huge complain?
Look at what Joe and his team has done! Really something new that we
Andras,
Yes my family is from Hungary. I clearly remember my grandfather’s strong
accent, expressions, and cooking! We have been in America only since WW1, and
am sure there are many relatives in Europe. I understand your concern
completely. Not sure there is much we can do about some
-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow
Have to agree with Jim, N2ADV. An expedition should NOT be using a
mode-in-development. It is a near-guarantee of confusion.
That said, DXpedition mode is something of a Pandora’s Box. Once opened, the
developers have no control over who uses
Hi Mike,
comments in line below.
On 14/03/2018 12:46, mwbese...@cox.net wrote:
Thanks Bill... but the point is people are NOT being respectful of
others. And for the record, I never claimed that anyone 'owned' any
give frequency, but we have lived by a gentleman's agreement for all
of the
Hello Mr. Molnar,
maybe our predecessors were fighting together for freedom here in Hungary.
A large port of the problem is jamming by operators of certain countries,
mainly in South-Europe.
Something has to be done against their bullying style.
I'm sure it helps!
GL de HA6NN
Andras
On Wed, Mar
Thanks Bill... but the point is people are NOT being respectful of
others. And for the record, I never claimed that anyone 'owned' any
give frequency, but we have lived by a gentleman's agreement for all of
the 43 years I have been a ham - and people mostly respected that
agreement. That's
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow
On 14/03/2018 10:24, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.
Hi Jim,
why not?
https://ty2018dx.wordpress.com/
and check their QRZ.COM page.
They are not some random
On 14/03/2018 12:24, mwbese...@cox.net wrote:
"and are fully aware of the caveats about making sure that callers
know how to work them etc. then their brave attempt to try out an as
yet unpolished feature"
And yet these 'brave' DXers landed smack on top of the PSK band. Great
job, geniuses.
Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 8:13 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow
On 14/03/2018 10:24, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
> TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.
Hi Jim,
wh
"and are fully aware of the caveats about making sure that callers know
how to work them etc. then their brave attempt to try out an as yet
unpolished feature"
And yet these 'brave' DXers landed smack on top of the PSK band. Great
job, geniuses.
Mike
WM4B
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:12
On 14/03/2018 10:24, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.
Hi Jim,
why not?
https://ty2018dx.wordpress.com/
and check their QRZ.COM page.
They are not some random OM playing with FT8 DXpedition mode on the
normal FT8 sub-bands. Benin may not be
Have to agree with Jim, N2ADV. An expedition should NOT be using a
mode-in-development. It is a near-guarantee of confusion.
That said, DXpedition mode is something of a Pandora’s Box. Once opened, the
developers have no control over who uses it or when. It would be more than a
little naive
tream.net]
> *Sent:* 14 March 2018 10:25
> *To:* WSJT software development
> *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow
>
>
>
> TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.
>
>
>
> Jim S.
>
> N2ADV.
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2018, a
[mailto:oh1...@nic.fi]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:24 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:24:30 -0400
"James Shaver (N2ADV)" <n2...@windstream.net> kirjoitti:
> TY7C should not h
lots would have been set to 1, I think.
73
Charlie G3WDG
_
From: James Shaver (N2ADV) [mailto:n2...@windstream.net]
Sent: 14 March 2018 10:25
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] DXpedition mode: dissapointed somehow
TY7C should not have even been using
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:24:30 -0400
"James Shaver (N2ADV)" kirjoitti:
> TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.
>
> Jim S.
> N2ADV.
And why not?
For me TY is quite DX...
Jarmo
--
17 matches
Mail list logo