Bill Somerville kirjoitti 14.03.2018 klo 14:12:
On 14/03/2018 10:24, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
TY7C should not have even been using DXPedition Mode.

Hi Jim,

why not?

I totally agree with Bill.

Why this huge complain?
Look at what Joe and his team has done! Really something new that we never have seen before.

Maybe that is why there are always those ones that are against everything new.

DXpedition mode is not yet ready, and never will be if it is tested only in laboratory. That includes also tests by real DX teams like TY7C group. Not just those organized debugging events that are the base for properly working versions.

True DX teams need also experiences of usage, even with just buggy rc-versions of program. What do you think would happen if DX group just get 100% working program with them to DX pedition, but nobody have ever seen, tried or even heard about the usage?

If we look to traditional DXpeditions using CW or phone they easily roll over "normal usage" frequencies. With Split CW from 1.5kHz to 10kHz and with split phone from 5kHz to 25kHz. That is 10 FT8 "bands".
And so little complains !

We need more space for new digital modes. That is never going to happen if we just make plans. It will be endless chain of meetings without results if there is not urgent need to do something. And that need comes when new modes are used in somewhere. It is sure they always take part from some other mode as there are no empty gaps reserved for future modes within our bands.

I have funny feeling that I remember time when PSK was invented and caused lot of anger because it was used on conventional rtty frequencies.
Sounds like history is repeating itself...

--
Saku
OH1KH

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to