Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

net wrote: > > Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 22:30:14 + (UTC) > From: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com <mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com>> > To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> > Subjec

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

Original Message- From: Alex, VE3NEA <alsh...@dxatlas.com> Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2018 5:20 a.m. To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible? On 2018-05-09 10:40, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: > There apparently was somebody on 20M F

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

uld decide what happens, not the wider Internet community. 73 Gary ZL2iFB -Original Message- From: Alex, VE3NEA <alsh...@dxatlas.com> Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2018 5:20 a.m. To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible? On 2018-05-09 10:4

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

Hello Alex, MSHV has such a mode. Unfortunately it is also capable to TX with multi carriers - and this is creating the same chaos as Fox & Hound does right now. I was a semi-rare DX stations with up to 12 callers at the same time. An 'Multi Answering Auto Seq Protocoll' with one carrier, will

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

On 2018-05-09 10:40, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074. Everybody though he was calling simple CQ but was Fox so wasn't hearing them and users were crowding the lower

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

ddressed in r8647? > > Jay KA9CFD > > > > Sent from my U.S.Cellular© Smartphone > > Original message > From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Date: 5/9/18 09:40 (GMT-06:00) > To: WSJT Software Development <wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com> Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible? There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074.  Everybody though he was calling simple CQ but was Fo

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

Mike, I believe Joe has a routine in a later build that inhibits FOX from using standard frequencies. It won't work, however, until the 'FOX' builds it or they download the GA release when it is available. Bobby/N4AU bob...@bellsouth.net n...@arrl.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

t; Cc: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com> Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible? There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074.  Everybody though he was calling simple CQ but was Fox so wasn't hearing t

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

Another "active solution": auto-disengage Fox mode if many decodes are standard CQs. It's a good indicator that you are sitting on the standard channel and shouldn't be allowed to call Fox. -- Brian AF7MD On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

Wed, 9 May 2018 14:40:40 + (UTC) Black Michael via wsjt-devel kirjoitti: > There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from > a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074.  Everybody S01WS every day, and running n5. Quite

[wsjt-devel] FT8 CQ Fox block possible?

There apparently was somebody on 20M FT8 last night in Fox mode from a relatively rare location and caused a mess on 14.074.  Everybody though he was calling simple CQ but was Fox so wasn't hearing them and users were crowding the lower end of 20M trying to get him making even the the Fox/Hound