Will,
Yes, we do the same zero crossing detection several ADX versions that use an
Arduino UNO or NANO. We are in the process of moving to a version that use the
Raspberry Pi PICO, which does not have zero crossing input capture and uses a 1
MHz clock, so either we have to take measurements
The http://qrp-labs.com/qdx.html _could_ use the same data stream (tones
instead of audio), but as JT points out then the 'radio' is in charge of doing
the transitions from one tone to another, and you need watchdog timers and
such. [The QDX does zero crossing detecton to determine the
Joe,
Thank you for the response.
I have read that article (and just reviewed it) and I stand corrected, a
continuous-phase, frequency shift keying.
The way ADX now generates the FSK signal (as many other similar generally low
power digital transceivers) is to measure the audio coming out of
Hi Alan,
On 9/19/2022 1:01 PM, Alan Altman AG7XS via wsjt-devel wrote:
Greetings,
Thank you for all the great work on creating and improving WSJT-X.
You are probably aware of the ADX transceiver designed by WB2CBA. It is a
simple open source digital HF rig designed for home brewing. We are
I assume this is similar to this?
https://create.arduino.cc/projecthub/pu2clr/shortwave-arduino-transmiter-with-si5351-and-arduino-421602
It can mix any audio source which is all the audio is from WSJT-X...nothing
special.
Trying to recreate the tone sequence seems like overkill.
I fail to see
Greetings,
Thank you for all the great work on creating and improving WSJT-X.
You are probably aware of the ADX transceiver designed by WB2CBA. It is a
simple open source digital HF rig designed for home brewing. We are working on
replacing the Arduino with a RPi PICO. Due to differences in
> On Oct 7, 2018, at 14:22, Gary Hinson wrote:
>
> Milliseconds before I clicked, the mouse had been pointing at N7DED’s CQ …
> but just as my eyes read the line and my brain told my right index finger to
> click the mouse, the decodes scrolled up a line as shown here … hence I
>
Um .. lets not add complexity when there is a perfectly good alternative
that does this and more ... JT-Alert
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 10/7/2018 5:18 PM, Chuck Furman wrote:
Gary Hinson and Bill Pence,
You guys both got my point! By the time your brain picks someone to
call, and your fingers click
-Original Message-
>
> > From: Gary McDuffie
>
> > Sent: 08 October 2018 08:31
>
> > To: chuck.fur...@gmail.com; WSJT software development
> > de...@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] New feature request
>
> >
>
say, challenging to interpret programmatically.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Gary ZL2iFB
>
>
>
> *From:* Chuck Furman
> *Sent:* 08 October 2018 10:19
> *To:* pence.b...@gmail.com
> *Cc:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] New featu
, and “CQ DX” would be,
let’s say, challenging to interpret programmatically.
73,
Gary ZL2iFB
From: Chuck Furman
Sent: 08 October 2018 10:19
To: pence.b...@gmail.com
Cc: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] New feature request
Gary Hinson and Bill Pence,
You guys
Gary Hinson and Bill Pence,
You guys both got my point! By the time your brain picks someone to call,
and your fingers click the mouse, the screen updates. The result is that
you end up clicking on the wrong row. FT8 is fast. You only have 15 seconds
to think. Before you even realize what you
Nope. He says as he clicked, the display scrolled, so the call he intended
was now above his mouse pointer.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018, 3:53 PM Gary McDuffie wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 2018, at 19:59, Chuck Furman wrote:
> >
> > Several times I accidentally clicked on a station calling CQ DX or some
>
for a bit while I hunt for my prey.
73
Gary ZL2iFB
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary McDuffie
> Sent: 08 October 2018 08:31
> To: chuck.fur...@gmail.com; WSJT software development de...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] New feature request
>
> On Oct 6, 2018, at 19:59, Chuck Furman wrote:
>
> Several times I accidentally clicked on a station calling CQ DX or some other
> directed CQ. This often happens just as the Band Activity window updates. I
> click on a CQ, but as the window updates, I find that I've actually clicked
> on
Please add a checkbox for* "Do not answer directed CQ's"* or maybe "*Disable
answering directed CQ's*" or "*Respond to general CQ's only*".
Several times I accidentally clicked on a station calling CQ DX or some
other directed CQ. This often happens just as the Band Activity window
updates. I
16 matches
Mail list logo
