Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of early results with WSJT-X 2.0-RC3

2018-10-18 Thread K2DBK-WSJT
wsjt-x (and presumably anything else that would ever need it without it's own copy). Is that correct? -Original Message- From: Joe Taylor Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 2:03 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] Summary of early results with WSJT-X 2.0-RC3 Hi all, Acc

Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of early results with WSJT-X 2.0-RC3

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Ellis via wsjt-devel
Many thanks, Joe! Installed SSL fix, then -RC3. Upload to LOTW was fine. On another topic: Thanks for the change in frequency-swap arrows that came out in -RC2. Much clearer now. 73, Andrew Ellis NO6E ⁣Sent from BlueMail ​ On Oct 18, 2018, 11:04, at 11:04, Joe Taylor wrote: >Hi all, >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Summary of early results with WSJT-X 2.0-RC3

2018-10-18 Thread Bill Somerville
On 18/10/2018 19:02, Joe Taylor wrote: 3. A few people have complained that color-highlighting does not work as expected.  Most of these can be traced back to not having used the available configuration options. Hi Joe, there is a defect in the new DXCC highlighting that means they are not

[wsjt-devel] Summary of early results with WSJT-X 2.0-RC3

2018-10-18 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi all, According to PSK Reporter statistics, more than 650 users are busy making QSOs with WSJT-C 2.0-RC3. This is good! Nearly all of the early reports are related to one of two issues: 1. Some Windows users receive error messages related to downloading the ARRL's LoTW status file.