Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

? :-) My WF settings: N Avg 1, Palete Green1 73 Libor OK2ZO - Original Message - From: "Gary McDuffie" <mcduf...@ag0n.net> To: "WSJT software development" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 8:28 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-d

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

Smeared is going to get some people angry emails about power, even though they aren’t running power. Hope it works out Ria N2RJ On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:30 PM Gary McDuffie wrote: > > > > On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Lawrence Lopez wrote: > > > > I found

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

> On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Lawrence Lopez wrote: > > I found the really liked the new format of the waterfall. > It was much less critical to adjust in order to get data. The waterfall has no bearing on the ability to decode. It isn’t even needed. Gary - AG0N

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

It took me a few days to get it the way I wanted it but I like it way better. Jim S. N2ADV -Original Message- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:27 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

I found the really liked the new format of the waterfall. It was much less critical to adjust in order to get data. True the contrast was lower but could see much more information was available. The previous version 1.8.0 did note seem to able to show weak signals. On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:26

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall

On 07/03/2018 16:21, Ron Schwartz wrote: The 1.9.0 rc2 waterfall now appears ‘smeared’ and weak traces are not as visible as earlier versions (see attached).  Is this an intentional change? Hi Ron, it has been changed, the intent was to improve the visibility of weak signals. Please try